Bowlus Bass Blog

All things bass (electric, acoustic, and upright) related.

My Photo
Name: Tom Bowlus
Location: Fremont, Ohio, United States

I am an attorney by day, but that's really just my "backup gig" in case this whole "musician thing" doesn't work out. ;^) I have recently been blessed with the opportunity to write freelance reviews for Guitar World's Bass Guitar Magazine, and I contributed regularly from the Spring of 2006 up until Bass Guitar's demise. This was, in itself, a dream come true, and an opportunity for which I am truly grateful. But now, this adventure is going to the next level, and I am now the Editor-in-Chief of a new bass gear-oriented magazine, call Bass Gear Magazine. Our first issue comes out this Spring (2008). Of course, on the topic of my true blessings, I have a wife and two kids, all of whom I greatly adore, so my time for music/bass/songwriting/performing, and yes, even the occasional practicing, is not infinite. Nevertheless, I really enjoy my time spent playing bass, writing and recording songs, and just getting to "play" with all that great gear! This blog is a result of these external interests...

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Tom's Gear For Sale!

It may come as a surprise to some of you that I would even consider selling anything, but the truth of the matter is that I do have a finite amount of space (and not-infinite resources!), so every now and then, something has to go. This is a list of gear that I might sell. I reserve the right to change my mind at any point, so if you see something you really like, hopefully you'll catch me in the right mood. ;^] Once I commit to a sale, though, I will of course follow through.

Here's the gear that I may be tempted to let go for one reason or another:

EBS Fafner
Intersounds IVP
Peavey TMP-1
PreSonu Eureka
Tube Works RT-2100-ES
Accugroove Tri 208
Bag End S12E-C
Bag End S12E-D
Peavey 1820
Raezer's Edge Bass 10
Raezer's Edge Bass 12-400
Yamaha 2x8 plus horn PA cabs (two)
Trace Elliot GP12 XV
Epifani T-212D
Epifani T/UL-115 (T-115 with UL driver)
Schecter Stiletto Diamond Series 8-string
G&L ASAT Semi-Hollowbody

Bowlus Bass Borg (gear in the 'collective')

Heads:

Aguilar DB 750
AMP BH-420 (possibly for sale)
Ampeg SVT ('71)
Ashdown Labs Superfly
Carvin B1500
Carvin B800
EA iAMP 200
EA iAMP 350
EA iAMP 500
EA iAMP 600
EA iAMP 800
EBS Fafner (possibly for sale)
EBS HD350
Eden VT-300A
Eden WT-405
Eden WT-550B
Epiphone Valve Jr. (guitar head, but works great for bass)
Fender 800 Pro
Gallien-Krueger 700RB-II
Gallien-Krueger 2001 RB
Glockenklang Heart-Core
Markbass LMII
Markbass Classic 300
Markbass Studio Pre 500
Mesa/Boogie Bass 400
Mesa/Boogie D-180
Mesa/Boogie Walkabout
Mesa/Boogie Fathom (M6 Carbine)
Mesa/Boogie Titan V-12
Music Man HD-500 (possibly for sale)
Orange AD200B Mk 3
Peavey Classic 400
Phil Jones Bass M-500
Phil Jones Bass M-300
Reeves Custom 225
Sadowsky SA200
SWR Electric Blue (modded to Baby Blue II specs)
Trace Elliot Hexa Valve
Trace Elliot Twin Valve
Trace Elliot V8
Trace Elliot VA400
Trace Elliot V-Type 600H
Trace Elliot AH1200SM (for sale/trade)
Traynor Mono Block B (for sale/trade)
Traynor YBA200
Tube Works RT-2100-ES (for sale/trade)
Walter Woods Ultra
Yamaha BBT500H

Preamps:

Aguilar DB 659
Aguilar DB 680
Alembic F-1X
Alembic SF-2
AMP SL-1
Ampeg SVP Pro (en route)
ART Tube MP Studio
Ashdown RPM-1 EVO II
Avalon U5 (sold)
Demeter HBP-1
Demeter VTBP-201 (for sale/trade)
Demeter VTBP-201s
EBS-1 Classic
EBS MicroBass II (see also "Direct Boxes")
EBS ValveDrive (see also "Effects")
Eden Navigator
Epifani Quest II
Fender TBP-1
Hughes & Kettner B.A.T.T
Hughes & Kettner Tubeman
Intersounds IVP (for sale/trade)
ISP Technologies Beta Bass Processor
Kern IP-777
Millennia TD-1
Peavey TMP-1 (possibly for sale/trade)
Phil Jones Bass Buddy
Phil Jones Bass P-1
PreSonus Eureka (possibly for sale/trade)
PreSonus TubePre
Radial Bassbone (see also "Direct Boxes")
Raven Labs MDB-1 (see also "Direct Boxes")
Raven Labs PMB II (see also "Direct Boxes")
SansAmp RBI
Skjold Pro Sound Preamp (Prototype #2; 12SX7-based pre)
Stewart UDP-1a (two)
Summit Audio TD-100 (see also "Direct Boxes")
The LowEnd True Voice
The LowEnd True Voice custom 2-channel 12AX7
Trace Elliot GP12 SMX
Trace Elliot GP12 XV (possibly for sale/trade)
Trace Elliot TVT9 (guitar preamp, but sounds great on bass!)
Trace Elliot V-Type
Tube Works Blue Tube (rackmount; see also "Effects")
Warwick Quadruplet (possibly for sale/trade)

Power Amps:

Aguilar DB 728
Ashdown PM 600
Crest CA9 (three)
Crown XLS 602
Demeter VTHF-300M
Eden WT-1000
Mesa/Boogie M-190
Phil Jones Bass M-5000
Stewart World 2.1
Trace Elliot VR350

Cabs:

Accugroove Tri 208 (for sale/trade)
Accugroove Tri 115L
Accugroove Whappo, Jr.
Ashdown Mini115 (two; possibly for sale/trade)
Ashdown Mini48 (two; possibly for sale/trade)
Azola Super Wizzy 2x12 (two; possibly for sale/trade)
Bag End S12E-D (ELF sub; for sale/trade)
Bag End S12E-C (ELF sub; for sale/trade)
Bergantino custom 1x15 sub's (two; in HT Large boxes)
Bergantino AE112 (two)
Bergantino AE210
Bergantino AE410
Bergantino EX112
Bergantino EX115
Bergantino HS210
Bergantino HS410
Bergantino HT110 (two)
Bergantino HT112
Bergantino HT112 ER (two)
Bergantino HT115 (two)
Bergantino HT122s (possibly for sale/trade)
Bergantino HT210 (two)
Bergantino HT212
Bergantino HT310 (two)
Bergantino HT322
Bergantino IP112
Bergantino IP153
Bergantino IP212
Bergantino IP310
Bergantino IP322
Bergantino NV215
Bergantino NV412
Bergantino NV610
Carvin LS1503 (two; possibly for sale/trade)
EA iL-110
EA NL-210 (three, one 4 ohm)
EA NM-410
EA VL-108 (two)
EA VL-110 (four)
EA VL-208 (five, one 4 ohm)
EA Wizzy (two)
EA M-line Wizzy (two)
EA Wizzy 10 (two)
EBS Neo-112 (two)
Epifani T/UL-115 (T-115 with UL driver)
Epifani T-212D (for sale/trade)
Epifani UL-310 (Series 1; two)
Epifani UL-410 (Series 2; early version)
Gallien-Krueger Neo112
Gallien-Krueger Neo212
Glockenklang 6-Box
Glockenklang Double (German version; two)
Glockenklang Duo (German version)
Glockenklang Duo Wedge (German version)
Glockenklang Space Deluxe (German version)
Glockenklang Take 5 4x10
Glockenklang Tedd
Hevos Midget (4 ohm)
ISP Technologies Bass Vector 115 (powered)
Markbass CL108
Mesa/Boogie Diesel 4x10, “Deep”
Mesa/Boogie Diesel Powerhouse Jr. (1x12, 4x8)
Mesa/Boogie Diesel 215 EV
Mesa/Boogie Powerhouse P212
Mesa/Boogie Powerhouse P210
Music Man HD-210
Music Man HD-212
Orange OBC 410
Orange OBC 115
Patterson Audio/LDS 2x8 (two; 2-way, w/ titanium Selenium tweeters)
Peavey 1820 (for sale locally)
Phil Jones Bass 6T
Phil Jones Bass 9B
Phil Jones Bass 4B
Phil Jones Bass Neo-Power 8B (two)
Raezer's Edge Bass 10 (possibly for sale/trade)
Raezer's Edge Bass 12-400 (possibly for sale/trade)
Sadowsky SA210
Sadowsky SA410 (two)
SWR Henry the 8x8 (possibly for sale/trade)
Trace Elliot 1028H
Trace Elliot 2103H
Trace Elliot 2103x
Trace Elliot 1518C
Trace Elliot 4052H 4x5 Bright Box
Trace Elliot 1048
Trace Elliot 1513 (two)
Trace Elliot 1x10 (two; one with tweeter)
Wayne Jones 2x10 (two)
Yamaha BBT110S (two)

Combos:

Ampeg B-15-N
Fender RAD Bass
Hughes & Kettner QC310
Hughes & Kettner QC412
Hughes & Kettner QC421
Phil Jones Briefcase
Phil Jones Flight Case BG-150
SWR Baby Blue II 2x8 Combo
Trace Elliot Valve Twin Combo (1x15)

Electric Basses:

AC Guitars Custom Singlecut 5
Acoustic Black Widow
B.C. Rich Warlock (USA Custom)
Celinder J-Update 5
Celinder J-Update 4
Celinder Vintage Precision 4
Curbow American Petite 5
Curbow Custom Jazz 5 (fretless)
Danelectro Baritone
DeArmond Pilot 5 Deluxe (w/ Bart pickups and Aguilar OBP-3)
Dingwall Afterburner 4 (1 of 2 NAMM prototypes)
Dingwall SJ4
Dingwall Z3 (on order)
F Bass BN4
F Bass BN5
F Bass VF5
Fender American Deluxe Jazz 5
Fender American Deluxe Precision 5
Fender TNB110-SPL Thinline Precision Hollowbody (CIJ)
Fender Hollowbody Precision A/E (MIJ)
Fender Jazz Bass (1973)
Fender Roscoe Beck V
G&L ASAT (Semi-Hollowbody; possibly for sale/trade)
Gibson Explorer
Gibson Thunderbird IV
Gretsch Broadkaster
Groove Shoppe GS5 (on order)
Guild Pilot
Ibanez ATK750 (limited edition, koa top)
Ibanez USA Custom ATK 4-string
Ibanez USA Custom ATK 5-string
Ibanez Road Star II (RB 680; possibly for sale/trade)
Lakland Skyline Darryl Jones 4 (Aero pickups)
Lakland Skyline Joe Osborn 4 (Lindy Fralins; stacked knobs; possibly for sale)
LeCompte CB SC-4
LeCompte VB-5
Lotus 4-string (my first bass!)
MTD custom chambered prototype 535-24 (chambered alder/water cured redwood/maple/ebony; Marilyn #3)
MTD-435 (ash/quilt maple/wenge/wenge)
MTD 435-24 (mahogany/quilted maple/maple/ebony)
MTD 535-24 (mahogany/flamed rambutan top and back/wenge/wenge)
MTD 535 (ash/figured maple/wenge/wenge)
MTD 535 (ash/walnut/maple/maple)
Nordstrand SC5
Nordy vJ5 (alder/rosewood)
Nordy vJ5 (ash/maple)
Reverend Rumblefish XL
Rickenbacker 4003
Rob Allen Mouse 30 fretless
Sadowsky 25th Anniversary 24-fret 5-string
Sadowsky P/J 5
Schecter Stiletto Diamond Series 8-string (possibly for sale/trade)
Skjold Custom 5 (mahogany/rose myrtle/7-piece neck/bubinga board)
Skjold Custom 5 (mahogany/flamed maple/7-piece neck/mac ebony board; en route soon)
Skjold Exotic Custom 4
Skjold Exotic Custom 5 (Pete's first Exotic Custom!)
Skjold Exotic Custom 5 Fretless
Skjold Lion's Pride 5, Model-A
Skjold Lion's Pride 5, Model-B
Skjold Custom 10-string (on order)
Squire VM Precision TB
Tobias Contender 4 (pre-Gibson) # 214 (1 of 5)
Tobias Basic 5 (pre-Gibson), # 766 - "Jimmy Haslip" model
Tobias Classic 5 (pre-Gibson), # 601
Tobias Killer-B 4 (Burbank era)
Tune TWXT-8N 8-string (possibly for sale/trade)

Acoustic Bass Guitar:

Epiphone El Capitan

Upright Bass:

1940's(?) Kay C-1, with Barbera Bridge Transducer pickup

Direct Boxes:

ART Tube MP Studio
Avalon U5 (sold)
Demeter VTBP-2B
EBS MicroBass II (see also "preamps")

Groove Tubes DITTO (sold)
Groove Tubes PDI
Millennia TD-1 (see also "preamps")

PreSonus TubePre (see also "preamps")
Radial Bassbone (see also "preamps")
Raven Labs MDB-1
Raven Labs PMB II
Summit Audio TD-100 (see also "preamps")

Effects:

Akai Deep Impact
Akai UniBass
AnalogMan Clone Chorus (with deep option)
Bag End ELF M2 Processor
Carl Martin Heavy Drive Distortion (possibly for sale/trade)
Chandler Tube Drive (rackmount)
Danelectro Daddy-O
Danelectro Milkshake Chorus
Demeter Compulator
Demeter FOD-1
EBS ValveDrive
EH Big Muff Pi
EH POG
EH Q-tron
EH White Finger compressor (possibly for sale/trade)
Fulltone Bass-Drive
Lexicon MPX550
MXR Phase 100
Peavey Tube Sweetener
PreSonus ACP-22+
Raven Labs True Blue EQ
Subdecay Flying Tomato Fuzz (possibly for sale)
Tube Works Blue Tube (pedal)
Tube Works Blue Tube (rackmount; see also "Preamps")
Tube Works Tube Driver (rackmount)

Misc.:

AnalogMan Loop Pedal
Boss TU-2
Lehle Dual
Lehle Little Lehle
Kart-a-Bag Tri-Kart 800
Korg DT-7
Korg Triton Rack
Mesa Boogie SUS-4 Racks (four 4-space, one deep 8-space, one regular 8-space)
Revolution Solo upright pickup
Roland PK-5 MIDI pedals
Shure ULXS14 Wireless
Warwick Rockstand 7-instrument case/stand (two)
X-Wire Wireless
Yamaha G50 Guitar MIDI Converter (with Bd1 pickup)

Here are some photos:






Okay, I had to do a bit of an updated photo. I am quickly running out of room to even sit in this room!


Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Issue #2 of Bass Gear Magazine available!

Okay, issue #2 of Bass Gear Magazine went out to the printer today! It is definitely a notch up from issue #1, especially in the technical reviews. To subscribe (paid print, or free digital sub) go to www.bassgearmag.com. The print version really has come out very, very nice and everyone who has seen them is very impressed. Kudos to Martin Roseman on his graphical and layout skills!

Take care, Tom.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Bass Gear Magazine Issue #1 Now Available!

I am very pleased to announce that Bass Gear Magazine's premier issue is now available for free digital subscription or paid print subscription at www.bassgearmag.com. This publication is dedicated to bass gear reviews, factory tours, show reports (NAMM, Musikmesse, and others), articles on how to buy/repair/mod gear, etc. We do extensive bench-testing of products, in addition to real world reviews.

I am the Editor-in-Chief, and I would love it if you could drop in over at www.bassgearmag.com and check us out!

Thanks, Tom.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Skjold Lion's Pride Model-A

Here are some shots of my latest Skjold (thanks, Juneau!). It is a Lion's Pride Model-A, with an ash body, redwood top, 3-piece maple neck, figured maple board with redwood blocks, Skjold SD-1 pickups set in the '70's Jazz position, and a custom East/Skjold Deluxe preamp.

I am going to pick it up at Pete's new digs when he moves to Ohio next week.


























































































































































I'm sure I will post more when I get it my own hands. Man, I can't wait!

I'm really anxious to check out my custom East preamp, too. I had asked Pete if it was possible to get his Deluxe preamp set up vol/vol, but still retain the option to switch to series mode. In series mode, the two pickups act as one big pickup, so you can't have vol/vol. But here's were John East got really slick. You switch to series mode by pulling up on the first volume knob, which then becomes your master volume (and the 2nd vol is inactive in series mode). Slick!

Tom.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Winter NAMM 2008

Okay, who else is going to the NAMM show in Anaheim this January? I will be out there (mostly on Friday and Saturday), and I hope to meet up with some of my friends in the industry as well as my fellow bass-playing buds. Feel free to send me an e-mail or PM if you are going to be out there.

There is a Bass Bash at J.T. Schmidts both Thursday night and Friday night, and I expect to be there both nights (though later on Thursday).

Take care, Tom.

Edit [1/30/2008]
Well, NAMM and the Bass Bash were both just great! I really enjoyed meeting and hanging out with my friends from TalkBass.com, and of course checking out all that gear was just great!

I'll have extensive coverage of the show in the inaugural issue of Bass Gear Magazine, a new (obviously gear-related) magazine, of which I am the Editor-in-Chief. :^) Stay tuned for more details...

Thursday, August 23, 2007

The 1x15 Shootout

One day, I looked around and thought to myself, "Dang, I've got, like, a bunch of 1x15's!" and so another shootout was born.

First things first. I know that people would love to see detailed measurements, as well as retail/MAP/used pricing, 'double blind' testing, and I know that there are always additional brands/models that people would like to see included in the shootout. Well, to those folks, I should probably apologize now, because that ain't all gonna happen. I'll do my best though, but I have somewhat of a 'format' down for my 'shootouts', and I'll likely stick to that format.

Speaking of that format, here are some quick links to prior shootouts:

1x8/1x10 Shootout
1x12 Shootout
2x10 Shootout
Combo Shootout
Mini Cab Combo Shootout

I should also clarify that with the exception of the Skjold/Dr. Bass cab, these are all my own personal cabs. If someone wants to send me something else to compare/contrast against the bunch, I certainly wouldn't mind, but for now, I am just working with what I have on hand.

Also, please note that I am predominantly a fingerstyle player, and I tend to favor the neck pickup (FWIW). I do, however, move my hand around a bit when doing these tests, and I also do attempt to explore the slap/pop tones (though my no means would I call myself a slap/pop player). I did not break out a pick for this shootout, but now that I think about it, maybe I will start doing that. The test bass was - as always - my trusty Skjold Custom 5. Amplification was provided by a Crest CA9, fed by a Millennia TD-1.

Okay, with no further delay, here is a rundown of the contestants (in alphabetical order):

Accugroove Tri 115L - 1x15 (neo), 1x6", 2 soft dome tweeters, 500w, 8 ohm, 38Hz to 18kHz, 101 dB, 42 lbs, 21.25" H x 24.75" W x 18.25" D

Ashdown Mini15 - 1x15 (ceramic), 300w, 8 ohm, 41Hz to 4kHz, 20 kg, 474mm H x 474mm W x 335mm D

Bergantino HT115 - 1x15 (ceramic), tweeter, 400w, 8 ohm,

Epifani T/UL-115 - 1x15 (neo), tweeter, 400w, 8 ohm, 38Hz to 16kHz, 100dB, 43 lbs, 21.50" H x 23" W x 17.75" D [note: these specs are for the current UL-115]

Glockenklang Tedd - 1x15 (ceramic), 1x6", 600w, 8 ohm, 100 dB, 31 kg, 655mm H x 550mm W x 455mm D

Orange OBC-115 - 1x15 (ceramic), 400w, 8 ohm, 30 kg, 620mm H x 510mm W x 460mm D

Skjold/Dr. Bass 1x15 - 1x15" (ceramic), 1x6", tweeter, 4 ohm [prototype - trying to get more specs]

Trace Elliot 1153 - 1x15 (ceramic), 200w, 8 ohm, 32Hz to 5 kHz, 49 lbs, 20" H x 24.2" W x 17.1" D

Trace Elliot 1518C - 1x15 (ceramic?), 300w, 8 ohm, 30Hz to 5 kHz, 100 dB, 46 lbs, 20" H x 24.2" W x 17.1" D

And here are some pics:


Another perspective:


And a flash shot (to show off that red baffle board! ):


So, here is my take on these cabs:

Accugroove Tri 115L - Very clear, articulate, and smooth. Very 'open' sounding. The high end is not as bright as some of the other tweeter-equipped cabs, but not really lacking, either, just a different character. Mids, overall, are full and smooth, with a little less low mid punch, and a litter more upper mid presence. The low B has a nice 'growl' to it, though it is not as full in the lows/low mids as the HT115. You definitely want to use this cab without the casters (it needs the coupling to fill in the low end a bit). Overall, very smooth, detailed, but not aggressive, and kinda 'laid back.'

Ashdown Mini15 - Impressively full sounding for its size, though not as full as most of the larger cabs (though slightly more full than the Tri 115L). Very punchy, and slightly honky in the upper mids. Kind of 'peaky' in its response. Doesn't go very high (even compared to the other tweeterless cabs), and somewhat muffled sounding. Handles a low B pretty well, with some growl on both the B and E strings. Sounds kind of like a smaller HT115 with the tweeter turned off. This model has been discontinued.

Bergantino HT115 - This cab has been my 'go to' 1x15 for some time. It is the most full sounding of the bunch, and has the most power through the lows and low mids. It's punchy and articulate, but somewhat darker in tone than most of the others. Generally very well balanced from top to bottom, but not as upper mid present as some of the others. The tweeter offers nice, bright high end, and it sounds very 'connected' to the woofer. Even the high notes are backed by a sense of fullness. The HT115 is not the 'prettiest' of the bunch played solo, but it dials up beefy fullness, and punchy articulation, with a nice tweeter layered on top. This model has been discontinued.

Epifani T/UL-115 - First off, I need to be clear about this cab. It started life as a T-115, and the previous owner replaced the ceramic driver with a UL series neo 15" (which, I believe, is a B&C driver). In all other respects, though (wood, tuning, crossover), it is a T-115. This obviously means that it is likely not entirely representative of how a UL-115 (or T-115, for that matter) might perform. But, with that caveat aside, I thought I'd share my thoughts on it anyway. It has a similar 'growliness' to the Tri 115L (could it be a 'neo thing'?), and is very similar in the low end to the Accugroove. It is also somewhat darker than the Tri 115L, and sounds kind of like a cross between the Tri and the HT115, though it is not quite as dark/full/punchy as the Berg, and not as smooth/open as the Tri 115L. The mids are more open sounding then the HT115's, but the high end on the two is very similar. It is not nearly as full as the HT115 on the low B, and kinda runs out of energy as you drop below the E (not terribly so, but comparatively so). This cab definitely has great potential for a 'slap cab', with a nice 'woody' and 'airy' high end snap.

Glockenklang Tedd - This cab is super articulate through the mids, and very aggressive. The high end is brighter than that of the Tri 115L, but doesn't have the same sheen as the HT115 or T/UL-115 - though the high end is really incredible for not having a tweeter. Very full and punchy, on the whole, but not as full on the low end as the HT115 (it might be, though, if laid on its side - which I did not do). The HT115 has more low mid punch, but the Glock has more upper mid punch (only the Skjold cab has more upper mids). Has a sense of 'effortless articulation' that reminds me of the Berg IP153 (maybe the secret is in the midrange drivers?). The low B response seems slightly stronger than the low E response. Great balance of fullness, articulation, punch, and clarity. This cab seems very loud for its 100 dB sensitivity rating. This model has been discontinued.

Orange OBC-115 - This cab was a bit of a surprise, as I had mostly just played it with the matching 4x10 and the AD200 head. I was really amazed at what a great stand alone cab it makes. Very full, very strong, very tight low B. Great articulation and growl on the low B. Not quite as full on the low B as the HT115, but closer than any other cab, and more articulate and controlled. I found myself just pounding away on the low B for the sheer joy of it. On the E-A strings, it was again not quite as full as the HT115 (and not as close as it was on the low B), and again more aggressive and articulate than the Berg. There is no tweeter (and no tweeter sheen), but it offers very impressive high end information, all things considered. It is not as dark sounding as the newer Trace cab, but more balanced, more articulate, and more powerful. On the whole, the competitor that most closely matches its performance is the older Trace 1153.

Skjold/Dr. Bass 115 - This cab was produced as a result of Pete Skjold looking into have a line of cabs built, and then teaming up with Marc Serio (Dr. Bass) to create an idea Pete had for a 3-way 1x15 design (which, FWIW, Pete had dreamed up prior to the introduction of the Tri 115L). This cab is not one of the more full sounding 1x15's, but it is one of the most aggressive and articulate. Compared to the Tedd, it is not as present through the low to middle mids, but it is even more aggressive in the upper mids. It has a somewhat similar low end response to the Accugroove/Epifani, but not as growly, and a tad bit more 'stout.' Please note, this cab was the lone 4 ohm model of the group, and I did do my best to correct the gains (by ear - sorry, technical types ) so that the cabs were playing at similar volumes. This model, or one similar to it, may be available through Dr. Bass.

Trace Elliot 1153 - As mentioned above, this cab was rather similar in overall performance to the Orange, and in fact, it was more similar to the Orange than it was to the newer Trace 1x15. It is not quite as full on the lows as the Orange, but has even better high end information and detail, and in some regards seemed even more articulate through the mids. Actually, on the whole, the overall midrange fullness and articulation is very similar between this cab and the Orange is very similar, but they each have their own character. Furthermore, the midrange articulation actually comes close to that of the Glock, which I found impressive considering it is a full-range design. Compared to the Epifani, the 1153 was more full in the lows, and more articulate and balanced through the mids. Compared to the newer Trace 1518C, the 1153 is more articulate and aggressive, and the 1518C is more dark (though not necessarily more 'warm'). The new Trace also seemed more 'peaky' compared to the nicely balanced 1153. Like the Orange, I just found myself not wanting to stop playing though this cab. It's truly impressive as a stand alone, and two of them sound great as well. For the pittance these go for on the used market, I'd say it's a great bang for the buck cab. This model has been discontinued.

Trace Elliot 1518C - As mentioned, above, the 1518C is not a carbon copy of the older 1153, and definitely has its own sound. It is very full down low, but sounds somewhat uneven in its response. It is very punchy, and bigger sounding that the Mini15, but not as focused. It has more low end fullness and power than the Tri 115L, but not as much as the HT115. I can't avoid feeling like this cab is really meant as a 'supporting cab' to be teamed up with a 2x10 or 4x10, as opposed to a stand alone.

In summary, I was honestly very impressed with all of these cabs. I know, I know, I tend to like everything, but please keep in mind, I am already working with gear that I liked well enough to buy. As I see them, these cabs fell into two overlapping categories. First, there is the 'tweeter versus no tweeter' thing, which is blurred somewhat by the impressive midrange of the Tedd. The HT115 and T/UL-115 definitely have the most sparkle of the group, and the Skjold/Dr. Bass cab probably has equal high end, but since it also has a tremendous amount of upper midrange presence, the highs don't seem to stand out quite as much. Some of the non-tweetered cabs had truly exceptional 'high end' articulation and detail (I still don't know just how the Orange and 1153 do this), while others were more limited in upper frequency extension (like the Mini15 and 1518C).

Second, there seems to be at least two different design goals at work here, with some cabs being designed with a goal of stand alone use, and others seeming to be destined for use with a second, complimentary, cab. The Mini15 is probably the most clear example of this second design goal. I suspect that it was intended primarily to serve as part of a two cab combo, in conjunction with one of the other 'Mini' cabs (the Mini48 makes an especially good pairing). Similarly, the 1518C is not the best of the bunch on its own, but it definitely seems more at home when used with the 1028H 2x10. Then there are the cabs which seem to do well in both 'stand alone' mode and as a supporting role (the Accugroove, Berg, Epi, Glock, Orange, and 1153 seem to fit this category).

This shootout more than any other I have done leaves me feeling like I am dealing with a number of highly capable cabs, and I can think of scenarios where pretty much any of them would be ideal. There was also quite a lot of variety in the tone and response of these various 1x15's, leading me to believe that this form factor is more flexible than some (myself included) may have believed. In appropriate circumstances, I can see where some would make good stand alone cabs, and I can also see where two 1x15's would offer a killer 'mini big rig.' And then again, there is the traditional 1x15/2x10 (which I am definitely digging right now) or 1x15/4x10 combos.

Going into this shootout, I was already a '15's kinda guy' in many regards, and I think that at the end of it all, I have even more respect for what a 1x15 can do.

More to follow, I am sure.

Thanks for putting up with my ranting (again).

Tom.

Friday, July 13, 2007

The Combo Shootout!

Well, I had a little bit of time to do a shootout, but instead of doing some of the things I really need to, like update my 1x10 and 1x12 shootouts, instead, I did the shootout that no one asked for and no one probably cares about - the combo shootout! To be honest, I had been meaning to do this for a while, especially after picking up those Hughes & Kettner combos. The group is fairly diverse, but they all count as combos, so what the heck.

Here are the contestants:


Here are the deets, such as I could find them. The quoted wattage is into the internal speaker(s) only, unless otherwise stated.

SWR Baby Blue II (2x8, plus 5" mid, 160w @ 4 ohms, 42 lbs)

Eden CXC110, aka Time Traveler 10 Combo (1x10 w/ coax tweeter, 200w @ 8 ohm, but 330w @ 4 and 420w @ 2, 39 lbs)

Roland Bass Cube-100 (1x12, w/ coax tweeter, 100w @ 8 ohm, I think, 37 lbs, 8 oz)

Fender RAD Bass (1x10, 25w, pretty light - need to weigh)

Phil Jones Bass Briefcase (2x5", 100w @ 4 ohm, 28 lbs)

Hughes & Kettner QC 412 (1x12, 400w @ 4 ohm, 43 lbs)

Hughes & Kettner QC 421 (2x10, 400w @ 4 ohm, 64 lbs)

Trace Elliot Twin Valve Combo (1x15, 100w, all-tube, heavy )

My Skjold Custom 5, which is normally my 'test bass' is at my band's practice room, so I used another bass that I am very familiar with, my primavera/redwood/wenge/wenge MTD 535. Unless otherwise noted, I set the tone controls flat, although on combos with the 'Enhance' knob, I did tweak it slightly (see notes, below). For combos with compression, I did most of my testing with the compressor set off.

In no particular order, here are my observations:

SWR Baby Blue II - this has become my 'reference combo' and it probably gets more playing time than any other rig I own, since it is also my primary personal practice amp. It is full, smooth and articulate, with very good definition even on the low B. It is not super sparkley up high, but you can certainly dial in some more brightness. It is fairly well balanced from top to bottom, but has more upper midrange presence than most. I had the Enhance set at about 9 o'clock. Volume-wise, it is certainly louder than you expect from its size, and it does not break up, even when pushed close to its limits.

Eden CXC110 - I had the Enhance barely on, compressor off, and the 'Warm' switch engaged (most of the time), with other tone controls set flat. It is has more low mids than the BBII, and less upper mids, with an overall darker tone. It is somewhat hollow through the mids compared to the SWR, but with a brighter - though somewhat 'clacky' - high end. Engaging the 'Warm' switch helped smooth out the high end, I thought, and seems to fill in the mids some, too. The difference is subtle, but on the whole, I prefer it engaged. It is not as loud as the BBII, and does not stay as tight/controlled on the low B when pushed. I will say, though, that this combo, in particular, gets a notable bump in performance when you add the extension cab (more on that later).

Roland Bass Cube-100 - this amp is a bit louder than the BBII, and has good tonal balance from top to bottom, with a strong attack and good articulation. The way the gain stages are set up, you can dial in some 'overdrive', but this seems to mean that you get at least some hint of overdrive (the tone/extent of which varies from model to model) when you push the max volume. On the whole, though, I love this 'feature', especially when playing with the amp modeling. It is not as smooth as the SWR, and in truth, the tone and attack sound a bit synthetic. The perception that you are hearing some 'digital artifacts' is ever-present, IMHO, regardless of the control settings, though it's not a major issue, and you may not hear it in a mix. Also, even with the compressor turned off, it sounds like a compressor/limiter is working in the background. This amp has LOTS of very cool features, which I didn't really get into, since the other combos don't offer anything like it. But, if a variety of models and effects appeal to you (and they do to me, to an extent), these features are definitely usable, and not mere gimmickry. Unfortunately, it is a fairly noisy amp.

Phil Jones Bass Briefcase - This diminutive combo is not as loud as the rest (not counting the RAD Bass), and when you are hitting the low B at near max volume, it is not as thick, loud or powerful as the others. But this is to be expected. Two 5" drivers can only move so much air (the amp gets much louder when driving an external cab or two). The midrange is somewhat similar to the BBII, with a bit more clarity and presence in the upper mids and more air to the highs. At low volumes, it does a low B very well, and the tone is very full range and quite impressive. But, the lows do definitely compress at higher volumes. This combo in particular reacts to where it is positioned within a room, and placing it in a corner will help you get more low end at higher volume. This unit can be battery powered, which is pretty cool, but I ran it on AC power for this shootout.

Fender RAD Bass - this combo has been in my stable for a long time. I have always liked its tone (and at the time I bought it, I thought it was just about the best sounding combo I had heard), but it just is not all that loud. Back when I was playing it regularly, I only had 4-string basses, and it always did fine. With a 5-string, though, the RAD really compresses like crazy on a low B. It doesn't fart or break up, but it gets very little volume out of a B-string. The midrange balance is fairly similar to the SWR, though not as smooth/full, and the highs are a bit thin and also kinda 'clacky.' You can tame the highs a bit with the EQ, but they remain kind of thin. When you push the volume limits it seems that there is a built-in limiter that is fairly aggressive. Still a very cool little amp that sounds good to my ears, but is best saved for 4-string basses.

H&K QC 412 - this combo (and its sibling) are much, much louder than anything else (so far). It is massively powerful, and very dynamic. The tone controls are probably the most frustrating of the group, though, and this is complicated (enhanced?) by the fact that the three gain stages (I am counting the tube drive as one) also have a very audible effect on the tone of the combo. Set roughly 'flat', it has a fairly vintage vibe to it (with a more potent and tighter attack), but hitting the 'Punch' switch yields a more modern tone. But there is just a ton of tonal variety from changing up the gain stage settings, and it's hard to get a grip on just what it sounds like, since the tone changes depending upon the volume. On the whole, it is a very impressive sounding amp, but kind of difficult to dial in specific tones at specific volumes. With some familiarity, though, this amp can really shine. At the highest volumes, the low B does tend to compress a bit, but I am talking at really loud settings. The 412 has a more rich, complex and warm midrange than does the 421, but again, the 421 is bigger on the low B.

H&K QC 421 - most of what I said for the 412 applies, but this combo is even louder, almost to the point of being scary! If anything, the 421 is even harder to dial in, tone-wise, especially in the upper mids. The midrange on the whole is not as warm and inviting as that of the 412, but with some time spent tweaking the controls, you can certain dial in a variety of midrange-pleasing tones. The 421 handles a low B better at high volume, though, and never breaks a sweat, even when driven to stupid loud levels. The grill, however, starts to vibrate at higher volume settings - I plan on installing some rubber grommets or something to address this. Like its smaller sibling, this is a tremendously powerful combo that takes some getting used to, but rewards the patient.

Trace Elliot Twin Valve Combo - Tubes, baby! This is the only all-tube combo in the group, and you can definitely hear it. It is nearly as loud as the H&K combos, and delivers a great deal of heft and gravitas, even at lower volumes. This amp has a killer low B, though I should add that I bought this particular combo from Steve Azola, who did do some modification to the porting (and a few other tweaks, as I recall), and I think the low B performance benefited from this. It has the most midrange texture of the group, and is more harmonically rich (no surprises, here). It is a tad warmer than the BBII, and a hint of grind at the higher volume settings. I get the impression that the amp has more to offer, and the single 15" is running out of usable excursion. I've never tried an extension cab with this combo, but that might be very interesting.

Well, I tried to jot all this down pretty quick, and I reserve the right to edit, amend, add to, or detract from this shootout at my whim. I'll probably try at least some of these combos with an extension cab or two, and I will update as I can. Until then, I submit the above for your reading pleasure (or lack thereof), and for further discussion.

Edit: Well, I recently picked up two more combos that I need to spend more time with, but which also deserve attention. The first is a 1966 Ampeg B-15-N. You know this amp, but up until now, I had not had one in my stable as a reference. This particular unit appears to be in fine working order, and sounds great, but I think I am going to send it to Jess Oliver and have him really go over it with a fine tooth comb. That warm, full, 'glowing' tone is really something.

The second newcomer has me really excited. It's the Phil Jones Flight Case. This amp is very lightweight, nicely compact, more loud than you would expect (but still adhering to the laws of physics), and more than anything, it just sounds sooooo good. More to come, but at first blush, the Flight Case is very impressive.

Tom.
__________________

Monday, March 26, 2007

2007 Bowlus Bass Borg GTG

I am going to have to come back and post a lot more on this later, but I thought I would start off by posting a link to my YouTube videos from the event. Basically, it was night full of great gear and great musicians (mostly bassists). But I did get some friends to set up so that we could jam with drums and guitar.

Here are the results of a few of those jams:

Bowlus Bass Borg GTG Videos

Note: I do have some older clips up there from the 2006 GTG, and a few additional 'non-jam' videos from this most recent gathering.

Tom.

Thursday, June 01, 2006

2x10 Shootout

Okay, this review has been through several iterations, so I am going to list them from most recent to the oldest. This means that first, we have...

Part 3:

In this installment, four "newcomers" (Markbass 102P, Music Man HD-210, Sadowsky SA210, and Schroeder 1010) go head to head against the top three contenders from the prior shootouts (Bergantino HT210, EA NL-210, Glockenklang Duo Wedge). Here's how they look on paper:

Bergantino HT210 (500w, 8 ohm, 36 Hz to 18 kHz, 100 db, 64 lbs, 18” x 22.75” x 18”)

EA NL-210 (500w, 8 ohm, 45 Hz to 16 kHz, 100 db, 43 lbs, 22.5” x 17” x 15”)

Glockenklang Duo Wedge [German model] (400w, 8 ohm, 40 Hz to 18 kHz, 100 db, 53 lbs, 15.4” x 22.8” x 18”)

Markbass 102P
(400w, 8 ohm, 45 Hz to 18 kHz, 101 db, 33 lbs, 23.4" x 13" x 17")

Music Man HD-210 (350w, 8 ohm, 50 Hz to 20 kHz, 98.5 db, 64 lbs, 24" x 17.5" x 18")

Sadowsky SA210 (400w, 8 ohm, 48 Hz to 16 kHz, 100 db, 50 lbs, 22.75" x 18" x 11.5")

Schroeder 1010 (8 ohm, 100 db, and need more stats! )

And here is how they look on film:



I did this shootout at the same time as the 1x12 shootout, so the test gear was the same (Skjold Custom 5, Stewart Audio TD-100, Crest CA9), as was my playing style (mostly fingerstyle, with a little slap/pop for tone testing). My previous test results for the Berg, EA and Glock all pretty much held true, and I have spent more time trying to describe the newcomers.

The results, in alphabetical order:

Bergantino HT210 – This cab was very similar to the NL-210, and I was quite surprised by that. Also a true standaout. Most of the comments for the NL-210 also apply, but it was a bit tighter in the lows (with the NL-210 being a bit more warm). The mids were a bit more solid sounding, whereas the mids from cab EA were a bit more cutting. This cab really sounds like a “bass” cab, but still remains very dynamic, punchy, full and clear at the same time, and fast, yet with a sense of weight and gravitas. It was one of the louder of the 2x10's, if not the loudest of the group.

EA NL-210 – At the first 2x10 update, this cab actually exceeded my expectations (which were actually high to start with). It was as big, deep and full as the Acme in the lows, but with even more crisp high end (compared to the Low B-2). Midrange clarity was exceptional, with a very quick, very articulate tone and tons of attack. I was surprised, but impressed, by its similarities to the HT-210 (see above).

Glockenklang Duo Wedge– This extremely impressive cab sounds like a cross between the NL-210 and the HT210 (you see why these three were my top picks from before? ). It was not quite as big sounding as either of these two, but was very close in this regard. Considering its compact size and wedge design, this is to be expected. Great articulation, clarity and precision without sounding at all harsh. Again, a standout cab among a very good group.

Markbass 102P - Despite its diminutive size, this little cab is very full and big sounding, which seems to mostly stem from an enhanced low mid voicing. By contrast, it seems to be missing some presence in the upper midrange. The tweeter adds a respectable degree of clarity, but seems to add more string noise than most. On the lowest notes, I did notice the response falling off fairly steeply below A on the B string, but down to that point it was very strong. Once I stood the 102P on end, it sounded much better to my ears (more balanced and articulate, smoother high end), but the overall impression is still a big low end (down to a point), somewhat reticent upper mids, and a rather sharp high end. The overall package is quite respectable, IMHO, especially for such a small and light package.

Music Man HD-210 - Looking at my notes, the first thing I wrote down was "Wow!", and that about sums it up. It was big, full, deep yet tight in the lows, with a very open high end, and balanced/articulate mids. It did not go quite as deep as the HT210, but in other respects, sounded very similar, though it perhaps had tad more presence in the upper mids, relative to the Berg. Compared to the Glock, it was not quite as "refined", but again quite similar. I wish this cab had an L-pad adapter on the tweeter, though in truth the highs sounded quite nice "set" as it was (with perhaps a tad too much string noise). This cab is rather heavy, but probably delivers the best bang for the buck, tone-wise, of any 2x10 (and perhaps any cab) I have played. Very impressive!

Sadowsky SA210 - This compact, shallow cab is not quite as deep or full sounding as the NL-210 (few cabs are), but otherwise shared many similarities with the EA, including similar "warmth with clarity" through the mids. The tweeter is fairly aggressive and expansive, though still "connected" to the drivers, which are themselves very punchy. There is a combined sense of clarity and presence that begins in the mids and carries through to the highs. It's not a bump/hump, but just a slightly enhanced presence over this broad range. I have found this to cut through very well in a mix, but without getting boomy or obnoxious. This cab was designed to be used with the all-tube SA200, and as such, I find that with SS amps, some slight low end boosting is called for. Still, it takes to low frequency boost fairly well, and is a full sounding cab, on the whole. Relative to the Duo Wedge, it was also quite similar, though not as open sounding (which is a characteristic that Glocks seem to do so well). While this cab was designed and built by Jim Bergantino (and its outer shell is shared by the HT210S), the drivers, crossover and tweeter are different, and the SA210 has its own voice (exellent, but different from the HT210S). The drivers are very efficient, and this was one of the louder cabs of the group.

Schroeder 1010 - I have had the pleasure of hearing a number of Schroeder cabs, and this one is perhaps my favorite. Compared to the other Schroeders I have played, it seems more tonally balanced and more clear and precise with fingerstyle playing. That said, compared to the other cabs in this roundup, it is rather boxy and a little congested sounding. There is not a whole lot of what I call "true" low end, but it stays reasonably full. The 1010 is not as low-mid heavy as some other Schroeder cabs, but instead, it's more bumped in the upper mids (especially on the A and D strings). I do like this particular tweeter better than the Selenium titanium tweeter option, and I actually preferred the sound with it cranked up some (though this caused some hiss - which is not unexpected and was not a problem). Being an 8 ohm cab, the 1010 was not any louder than average for this group (though in its upper mid "boost range" it was very loud). Note: although "new", this cab is an older configuration, and Jorg has made numerous changes to his lineup. I am not sure that a 1010 is even offered right now.

I've been able to review some pretty killer 2x10's, and IMHO, this is a pretty competitive group. Please read any "negative" comments as references in context to the competition - which is very, very good!

And before Part 3, there was...

Part 2:

Okay, some time back, I did a little shootout among the 2x10’s that I had on hand at the time. Since then, I have acquired a few more, and I figured that it was time for an update. The cabs involved this time around are as follows:

Accugroove Tri 210L (600w, 4 ohm, 39 Hz to 18 kHz, 103 db, 57 lbs, 21.25” x 24.75” x 18.25”)

Acme Low B-2II (350w, 4 ohm, 41 Hz to 22 kHz, 93 db, 50 lbs, 23” x 15.75” x 16.5”)

Bergantino HT210 (500w, 8 ohm, 36 Hz to 18 kHz, 100 db, 64 lbs, 18” x 22.75” x 18”)

Dr. Bass Custom 2x10 (specs unknown – I’ll take some measurements later)

EA CxL-210 (600w, 8 ohm, 42 Hz to 14 kHz, 102 db, @ 80 lbs, 22.5” x 17” x 15”)

EA NL-210 (500w, 8 ohm, 45 Hz to 16 kHz, 100 db, 43 lbs, 22.5” x 17” x 15”)

EA VL-210 (500w, 8 ohm, 38 Hz to 15 kHz, 95 db, 70 lbs, 23.125” x 19.5” x 16”)

Glockenklang Duo Wedge [German model] (400w, 8 ohm, 40 Hz to 18 kHz, 100 db, 53 lbs, 15.4” x 22.8” x 18”)

Here's the lineup shot:



First off, let me say that I think that all of these cabs are very good (or else I wouldn’t have bought them!), and that personal preference will definitely be the deciding factor as to which one is “best” for a given person. My “testing equipment” included my Skjold Custom 5 (which is the instrument that I am the most familiar with right now, and a very clear, yet full-sounding, instrument), into a line driver (with variable high pass filter) built by Jim Bergantino, into a Crest CA9. The little line driver from Jim is deceptively simple, but it is the most clear, pure, uncolored and 3D sounding device I have at my disposal. Basically straight wire with gain (and a variable high pass filter, which I left turned off). Here’s a shot of the Bergantino line driver, if’n you’re interested:



Here are my thoughts/observations:

EA VL-210B – This cab was one of a few that could take all that one side of the CA9 could dish out (with the line driver cranked up all the way). In fact, this cab had no signs of breakup at all, even at the highest volumes I could push. The overall tone is slightly dark, with a deep tight low end – although the lows to low mids were not as full, overall, as some of the other cabs. Good clarity on the whole, with fairly smooth highs. Midrange was nicely present, but again a little dark.

Acme Low B-2II – Very deep and very full sounding. Also a very clear cab, but with less mids than some of the other cabs, and brighter highs than the VL-210B. I’d say that it is slightly mid scooped, though not perhaps compared to other cabs not in this shootout. This cab was louder than I expected, but it couldn’t take all that the CA9 could put out without showing signs of stress.

EA NL-210 – This cab was one of the standouts, and in fact exceeded my expectations (which were actually high to start with). It was as big, deep and full as the Acme in the lows, but with even more crisp high end (compared to the Low B-2). Midrange clarity was exceptional, with a very quick, very articulate tone and tons of attack. Could not handle full power from CA9 without signs of stress.

EA CxL-210 – This cab had probably the most cutting, bright, and clear tone. The midrange response was similar to the NL-210, but not as full, especially in the lows. Very, very quick (slightly more so than the NL-210), but somewhat thin sounding compared to the NL-210 and the Acme. Not as dark sounding as the VL-210, but with some definite similarities to its predecessor, on the whole.

Dr. Bass Custom 2x10 – This cab had a similar tonal range to the NL-210, but was not as polished. It was not as clear/precise as the best in this group, but had good articulation. There was a hint of vintage warmth to the mids. The high end sounded a bit boxy compared to the best in this group, but would probably be praiseworthy outside of a direct comparison to this particular competition. Not quite as full sounding as the Acme and NL-210, though very close. This cab was the punchiest of the group, and also took all that the CA9 could offer.

Bergantino HT210 – This cab was very similar to the NL-210, and I was quite surprised by that. Also a true standaout. Most of the comments for C also apply, but it was a bit tighter in the lows (with the NL-210 being a bit more warm). The mids were a bit more solid sounding, whereas the mids from cab EA were a bit more cutting. This cab really sounds like a “bass” cab, but still remains very dynamic, punchy, full and clear at the same time, and fast, yet with a sense of weight and gravitas. This cab also didn’t quite handle all the CA9 could put out, but was one of, if not the, loudest of the group.

Glockenklang Duo Wedge– This extremely impressive cab sounds like a cross between the NL-210 and the HT210 (which were very close to begin with). It was not quite as big sounding as either of these two, but was very close in this regard. Considering its compact size and wedge design, this is to be expected. Great articulation, clarity and precision without sounding at all harsh. This cab could take all the CA9 put out without stressing. Again, a standout cab among a very good group.

Accugroove Tri 210L – This cab shared some similarities with the NL-210, especially in the lows, but was even more full sounding and had the warmest tone, overall, of the group. Even the high notes maintained a certain thickness to them. This cab was not as clear, punchy or dynamic through the mids as some of the rest, but it moved the most air. Handled most of what the CA9 could put out, but not quite all.

Again, these are all very good, very impressive cabs. If I had to pick any “winners”, based upon sonic performance alone, I would have to say that the NL-210, HT210, and Duo Wedge made me sit back and say “day-um!” more than the others. However, I could easily see any of these cabs being someone else’s favorite based upon variations in personal preference. Also, I could gig quite happily with any of these (and in fact, I have gigged with most of them – the Glock being a very recent acquisition and only put through its paces at a gig in "vocal monitor" duty - which it handled quite well!).

Again, the EA NL-210, Bergantino HT210, and Glockenklang Duo Wedge ended up within spitting distance of each other, and for my tastes, my playing style, and with the associated gear used in this test, they would all via for top honors. For a small, compact wedge shaped "monitor", the Duo Wedge has a very big sound, but of course the NL-210 and HT210 both sound a tad bigger. The Glock does have a fairly unique voice, and it strikes me as somehow taking the rough edges off each note, but maintaining the clarity. The NL-210 surprised me with its authoritative sound, great volume, and excellent balance. But again, almost any subjective words that I can use to describe one of these three would tend to apply to the other two, as well. However, the NL-210 is the warmest of the three. The HT210 took the sound of the other two and just added some meat behind each note. Very dynamic, with a sense of deep forcefulness behind the clarity, the HT210 was probably the loudest/punchiest of the group (even though it couldn't quite take all the gain from the CA9 - but it didn't need to).

But, some thoughts on the other fine contenders:

VL-210 - two of these stacked, and pushed by a big old amp, are still a force to be reconned with. The louder you drive these cabs, the better they sound, IME.

Low B-2II - these cabs still offer excellent bang for the buck, and present a very smooth sound, with good clarity, and excellent low end in a compact, lightweight package.

CxL-210 - this cab is exceptionally quick sounding, with good high end zing and clarity. I can see where slappers might really like this sound (of course, it sounds great with other playing styles, too). In my previous 2x10 shootout, I felt that it was slightly more warm sounding and slightly less clear than the VL-210. Well, with the line driver and the CA9, it seems that my results are reversed to an extent, as the CxL-210 had more clarity, and the relative fullness was right about equal. These two really sound a lot alike.

Dr. Bass 2x10 - This thing weighs next to nothing, and it is in a very compact box. Combine its diminutive dimensions with the diminutive prices charged by Dr. Bass for their cabs, and you have a heck of a bargain that won't break your back. I am just amazed at how much power you can pump into these cabs.

Tri 210L - You can move a ton of air with this cab, and the tone is full, full, full. Although it is the biggest cab in the group, it's weight is deceiving and highly manangable. The low end had many similarities to the NL-210, but the mids were rather different. One unique characteristic of Accugroove cabs, IME, is that they sound full and rich no matter where you are playing on the fingerboard.

And starting it all, was...

Part 1:

I am lucky enough to own multiple very good 2x10's, and here is a little shootout I was able to do one night when the wife and kids were out, and I could shake the house a little!

Here were the contenders:



Again, if you don't know them by sight, they would be:

EA VL-210B
EA CXL-210
ACME Low B-2
Accugroove Tri 210L

These cabs were all used with my iAMP 800 (I had put the rack rig away by then), and I played through my Thunderbird, primarily. I did briefly play my 5-string through them, but as I had used all of them with the 5 before, I didn't spend a lot of time with the 5-string. Quick answer: they all do the Low B thing quite well, and do so consistent with the more general observations below. Here is what I found:

With EQ's all set flat and all tweeters (and mids) were all the way on - which is, of course, "flat" for the ACME and Accugroove, but "boosted" for the EA cabs, the cabs in the photo are arrayed from left to right in the order of the tightest low end, and greatest overall perceived clarity, to thickest low end (and least perceived clarity).

There were two big surprises for me, here. First, was that the CXL-210 was slightly more warm/round than the VL-210B. The CXL-112 is a very cutting and clear cab, and I thought that the CXL-210 would be between the VL-210B and CXL-112 in this regard. To my surprise, though, the CXL-210 takes a good bit of the edge off the CXL-112, and the VL-210B (with two mids and a tweeter, versus the CXL-210's single coax tweeter) has the edge in overall clarity, but is slightly thinner sounding than the CXL-210. This is even more intriguing given my prior comparison of my CX-310 to two VL-210's. In that scenario, the CX-310 had more cut and clarity, and equal "heft" and "weight." I can see why one VL-210 might sound thinner where two did not, but I am not sure why the CX-310 would have more perceived cut/clarity than the CXL-210. My guess is that it is, indeed, a perception thing, where once you stack two VL-210's, the low end beefs up to the point that perceived cut/clarity is reduced. I don't know...

The other surprise was that the Tri 210L was even thicker in the lows than the Low B-2. Accugroove cabs certainly are known for being full, rich, and phat, but the Low B-2 is the king of thick 2x10's (or so I thought!). Granted, the difference between the two was not huge, but nevertheless, I had expected the ACME to have the deepest, fullest, thickest low end, and was surprised when the Accugroove bested it in these regards. [For those desiring truly collossal tonal girth, I should point out that the Whappo, Jr. has even more low end weight than the Tri 210L!] Along with this, the ACME had more upper midrange and high end clarity than the Tri 210L. Keep in mind, this is with everything set totally flat, EQ-wise.

Overall, the two EA cabs were more similar than different, and the ACME and Accugroove cabs were also more similar than different. The EAs, had a thinner, cleaner sound, but could easily add bass boost to crank out truly massive low end. The ACME/Accugroove cabs appear to be designed from the opposite end of the spectrum, where you start out with a full, rich, tone, and cut low end if need be. Set flat, the Low B-2 or Tri 210L would be the kind of cabs that I would bring to an outside gig, or a room that is known for being a bit on the thin side, whereas the EA's are better suited for situtations where you might have to fight some boominess in a room or onstage. The latter seems to be more common for me, although I have played more and more outside gigs of late.

I guess there is a third surprise. The perceived loudest of all three cabs, with the gain set equal? The VL-210B. This came as quite a surprise, especially since the Low B-2 is a 4 ohm, and the Tri 210L had its Accuswitch set to 4 ohm. Both EA cabs are 8 ohm models.

I am not sure if these types of "shootouts" are at all helpful to the rest of you, but I do have people ask me about comparisons between these cabs, so I thought I would share.

Take care, Tom.

[Edit 10/25/05]

I have been meaning to get back to this 2x10 shootout for some time, as I have picked up some additional cabs (EA NL-210, Bergantino HT210, and a custom neo 2x10 from Dr. Bass). I still have not done a comprehensive test of all the available 2x10's, but for the sake of sharing some information (as opposed to none) concerning these cabs, let me state the following limited observations.

The NL-210 is a very light weight cab, and a breeze to manhandle. It is more warm sounding than EA's prior 2x10's, but is still very clear (though perhaps not as ultimately clear as the VL-210), and the bottom end on the whole is more full. Very nice balance of warmth and clarity in a very compact, lightweight package.

The HT210 is a real eye opener. So far, I have only compared it against my Tri 210L, but despite being rated at 100 SPL (versus the Tri's 103 SPL) and despite its 8 ohm rating (versus the Tri's 4 ohm load), the Berg was louder, punchier, more forceful, more clear, and had more dynamic impact than the Accugroove. Wow! I can't wait to put this cab through its paces!

The Dr. Bass cab is a custom compact/lightweight cab that Marc Serio built. After I provided him with some detailed feedback and some suggested modifications to make it even better, he offered to take the cab back and make the modifications for free! Great service, if you ask me. And indeed, it came back sounding even better than before. I love the size/dimensions on this cab, and it is also extremely light. The tone is very well balanced, and it can hold its own against the "big boys!"

Ultimately, depending on your personal preferences, playing style, and associated gear, any of these cabs might be "the one" for you.

Later, Tom.

Monday, May 29, 2006

The 1x12 Shootout

Okay, this has been a long time coming, and even after all the time I spent waiting until I had ALL the players on hand, I still had one soldier away on active duty (my CxL-112 is currently serving in the Cheezewiz Regiment). But, I can't wait forever, so here comes the Bowlus Bass Borg 1x12 Shootout!

The competition:

Bag End S12-D (200w, 8 ohm, 50Hz to 5kHz, 100 db, 41 lbs, 15.5" x 18" x 15.5")

Bag End S12X-C (200w, 8 ohm, 50Hz to __kHz, 100 db, 41 lbs, 15.5" x 18" x 15.5")

Bergantino EX112 (300w, 8 ohm, 48Hz to 18kHz, 97 db, 36 lbs, 15" x 17.5" x 13")

Bergantino HT112 (300w, 8 ohm, 48Hz to 18kHz, 97 db, 39 lbs, 15" x 17.5" x 13")

Bergantino IP112 (500w [amplified; 1,000w with ext. cab], 8 ohm, 15" x 17.5" x 13")

EA Wizzy (200w, 4 ohm, 45Hz to 12kHz, 103 db, 41 lbs, 19.25" x 17" x 12.5")

Epifani T-112 (300w, 8 ohm, 43Hz to 16kHz, 100 db, 41 lbs, 16.5" x 19.5" x 16.25")

Glockenklang Space Deluxe (250w, 8 ohm, 39Hz to 18kHz, 98 db, 43 lbs, 16.9" x 20.9" x 14.8")

Raezer's Edge Bass 12-400 (400w, 8 ohm, 40Hz to 4kHz, 99 db, 45 lbs, 18.5" x 17" x 14")

Schroeder Mini 12+ (500w, 8 ohm, 40Hz-20kHz, 100 db, ?? lbs, 16" x 16" x 16")

And here is the lineup:



As usual, the test bass was my trusty Skjold Custom 5, and the reference amp was a Crest CA9. My Bergantino line driver is off visiting its maker, so I used my Stewart TD-100. I was able to play through most of these cabs with Mike, Steve, and Pat at a recent GTG, but the commentary below is more directly from my own observations with me playing a range of fingerstyle approaches (some slap/pop), though certainly, Mike's playing through these cabs (using his Smith, and either his Focus Series III or Pat's WT-550) was fresh in my mind when I made my notes. For the most part, the results were consistent. Here we go!

Bag End S12-D - The S12X-C which we played at the Mini GTG was a bit of a surprise, and generally received good remarks. This is the X-C's tweeterless brother (which we did not play). For some reason, it did not seem to go quite as deep as the S12X-C, but did seem more smooth and even through the mids. It was certainly punchy, and just a slight bit "boxy" sounding (I need to try to better define what I mean by that, but just bear with me for now, please!). It has some definite tonal similarities to the EX112, but sounded a little rougher around the edges.

Bag End S12X-C - As mentioned above, this was one of the 1x12's that Mike, Steve, Pat and I checked out, and it acquitted itself well in a very competitive group. It is fairly balanced, tonally, and goes pretty deep for a smallish box. The coax tweeter is certainly aggressive, but not unpleasant. It takes a bit for your ears/brain to adjust to it, though. The mids are thick up to a point, and then they thin out a bit in the upper mids, but remain quite present. Just as the S12-D is reminiscent of the EX112, so, too, is the S12X-C comparable to the HT112. The Bag End seems to offer more lows, but is not as balanced through the mids, relavent to the HT112 The HT112 is more smooth, while the S12X-C is more aggressive.

Bergantino EX112 - This tweeterless cab has punchy, full mids, with a strong lower-midrange voice. The highs are somewhat muted relative to the Wizzy (though similar to the S12-D), and the low end is both deeper and more full than the Wizzy. On the whole, it sounds a lot like a more refined S12-D.

Bergantino HT112 - For some reason, the HT does not sound as punchy as the EX, and while the EX has just a hint of "boxiness", this does not seem to be present in the HT. The highs are crisp, but not harsh at all, and the transition from driver to tweeter is virtually seamless. It has a full low-midrange that is both very clear and quick, but also thick. It goes relatively deep, and never seems to chuff or choke on the lowest notes (even though some cabs may offer more volume on these notes). All in all, a very "comprehensive," refined presentation.

Bergantino IP112 - This is really not a fair comparison to the other cabs in the group. It has an internal amplifier (500w into its 8 ohm load, 1,000w with an 8 ohm extension cab), and an onboard, 2-channel DSP (see numerous other threads on the IP line of cabs for more details). It could go far louder than any of the other cabs without breaking up. It was much more full sounding, and went far deeper than anything else. There are no discernable peaks or valleys, and the overall tone is very "fast", with tons of dynamics and punch, but still open and clear. The mids were smooth, musical, rich, yet very defined. Not a hint of boxiness. The high end was sweet, clear, quick yet still full. This cab can do it all!

EA Wizzy - The Wizzy is very tight and controlled with a full tone, and smooth (slightly muted) highs. The low B through a single Wizzy is not huge sounding, but nevertheless balanced relative to the other strings. As you turn up the volume, the low B stands out more, but remains very tight. The mids are the predominant speaking voice, and offer a hint of vintage warmth, but with good articulation. The whizzer cone allows it to transmit more high end informatoin, and the highs seem go even higher as you turn it up. Depsite its low power rating, this Wizzy seems capable of taking a lot of power without breaking a sweat. It gets very loud, and while it is a somewhat "punchy" cab, and the mids are somewhat present, they are a musical, broad (yet not dramatic) midrange "push", as opposed to a definite peak. The Wizzy sits great in a mix, too.

Epifani T-112 - Next to the IP112 and the Glock, the Epi had the biggest, deepest low end (very close to the Glock in this regard). The T-112 also serves up beautiful, crystalline highs that seem to float above the cab and are very open and airy. It is somewhat scooped in the upper mids (the UL-112 definitely has more going on in the upper mids, though a little less on the lowest notes). This cab takes gobs of power effortlessly, but IME, it needs a lot of power to perform its best. When played loudly, the A-string seems a little too aggressive relative to the other strings, but it was not as peaky as the Schroeder. Also, at higher volumes you hear a good bit of string noise. While I didn't have one on hand when I was playing, going on Mike's UL-112 at the Mini GTG, I think we all preferred the UL-112 as a stand alone cab, but I just love the T-112 (NYC-112) as a compliment to the UL-110.

Glockenklang Space Deluxe - This cab also seems to offer it all, and comes the closest of all the non-powered cabs to matching the IP112. Its tone is big and full (with the deepest lows of the bunch - agian, notwithstanding the IP112), but it is also quick, tight, and clear, with a very "connected" sounding high end. It has an expansive sound, and great tonal balance. It is a little bigger in the low end compared to the HT112, but not quite as clear in the low mids as the HT112, though for the rest of the frequency range, it bears certain similarities to the HT112 - the Berg is a little more full/thick, and the Glock is a bit more open sounding. It feels a lot lighter than the 41 lbs quoted on the Glockenklang website.

Raezer's Edge Bass 12-400 - This cab was somewhat similar to the Wizzy, but not as full on the low B. It was more articulate than I had expected (based upon previous experience), but was definitely somewhat boxy sounding. It offered up a consistent, punchy tone as you cranked the volume. On the whole, it was not as defined as the Wizzy, but was not as peaky or muffled as the Mini 12+.

Schroeder Mini 12+ - Compared to most of the other cabs in this group, the Mini 12+ sounded a bit muffled (like the proverbial blanket had been dropped in front of it). The cab has a low-mid throatiness, and its response is kind of peaky (for instance, an E on the A string really pops out at you when played). I do like the tweeter in this cab much more than the Selenium titanium tweeter I have heard in some other Schroeder cabs, and in fact, I actually liked the high end pretty well, but it sounded rather detached, and kind of out there on its own. The low B was kind of chugging at higher volumes, though overall volume stayed fairly loud. It less muffled, but more "barky" at higher volumes, too. On the whole, it has a strong midrange presence, and is not as articulate, defined, clear as some of the other cabs.

Some of these cabs also made it down to the upright "belchfest" in Columbus. There were some commonalities, but also some marked differences in how these cabs performed with upright (and in the particular room) relative to electric bass (being played in my basement). I'll try to reflect more on that later, but I've got to go, so we'll stick with this content for starters.

Later, Tom.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Prototype Chambered MTD

In addition to a Sadowsky, one bass that I always wanted was one from the mind and hands of Michael Tobias. After perusing many photos on the MTD GAS pics thread over at TalkBass.com, I could take no more, and I contacted Joel at The Groove Shoppe to discuss an order for an MTD 535. Joel and I spent a lot of time talking about the various woods. I was initially really turned on by the flamed redwood tops (and I still am!), but Joel pointed me to some blackened (and flamed, and burled!) redwood similar to the top on this fretless he sold:



Well, needless to say, that got my attention!

So, after much debate, we decided that we would go with an alder body, blackened redwood top (with multiple veneers between), maple neck, and ebony (or perhaps Rose of the Mountain) board. But, before we placed this order, Joel had an opportunity to play a prototype that Mike had built which was much to these specs above, but which employed a chambered body (which is 2.25" thick), and which had a blistered ebony fingerboard. According to Joel, this was one of the best sounding/playing MTDs he has encountered.

But, Mike would not sell it, and instead opted to keep it for himself. He named it "Marilyn" in honor of the chambers. ;^] However, he did decide to build two more chambered basses, one with a 2" thick body, and one with a 1.75" thick body, to the same (or very similar) specs, and Joel was able to weasel me in on the 2" thick prototype! The specs will be as above, except that Mike may use a Rose of the Mountain fingerboard instead of the blistered ebony. They should sound quite similar, so I left it up to Mike to decide which would look best.

Being a fan of fingerboard dots, I asked about this possibility, and I think that were are going to use purpleheart dots, which will match the purpleheart veneer between the body and the top. Also being a fan of the volume/volume configuration, I requested this as well. Some of you may find both of these requests blasphemous, but hey, it is my bass, right? It will be a 24F model.

Needless to say, I am really stoked about this bass, and I can't say enough about the help that I received from Joel!

Here are some photos of progress so far. First, this is the block of flamed, burled, blackened redwood for the top:



Later, Joel was able to send me a photo of some potential fingerboards (these are "blistered" ebony, and the two-tone board is Rose of the Mountain):



Here is a shot of the boards taken from the other end:



I really liked the Rose of the Mountain, but would have been happy with any of those boards. I told Mike that I trusted his judgment, and left the decision up to him. I believe that we are going with the ROM board.

Joel really got me going when he sent me some pictures of the body after it had been cut!



and



I can't wait for more photos! I asked Michael about the option of doing wood control knobs or pickup covers, but he indicated that he does not offer these (the knobs take a lot of time, and get to be too expensive to offer, and the pickups come from Bartolini already set into the ABS shells). But, it looks like I may be able to get Pete Skjold to build me some wood control knobs from some of the scraps, so that should be cool!

Needless to say, I am very excited about this instrument! I will update this post as the "story" develops!

Of course, shortly after I committed to buying this bass, I did manage to snag myself one of Michael's earlier, creations, a Tobias Basic 5, but that is another story! ;^]. However, here is a "sneak peek!":



[Update on the fingerbaord]

I just received word that Mike decided to go with one of the blistered ebony fingerboards. It has sounded like he was leaning towards the Rose of the Mountain, but apparently changed his mind. I totally trust his discretion, so I am sure that it will be delicious! He said that the ebony would go better with the purpleheart dots, which makes sense.

Here are some additional shots that Michael sent me documenting the progress of my bass:



































































Once the bass was finished, it was first sent to The Groove Shoppe (whom I bought it through) and Joel took these photos:

































Here is a mini report on mine based upon last night's gig. In a nutshell, I'm even more in love that I could have imagined prior to the gig! I think that Joel nailed it on the head when he told me that this bass sounds like a "bigger version" of a "standard" MTD with these woods. This is very true, and at the gig, I noticed that the chambered 535 sounded much larger and more full sounding than either my 435 (mahogany body, quilted maple top, maple neck, ebony board) or my Skjold Custom 5. The B-string was huge, and the tone was full throughout its range. The expected MTD clarity was there, two, which really impressed me. My 435 was just a tad more bright/clear overall, but sounded thin in comparison (and with the mahogany body, I generally think of my 435 as a fairly full sounding MTD). The Skjold ended up sounding somewhat between the two MTD's, but the overall tone/feel through the chambered 535 made it sound like I had kicked in another wall of cabs, or else another bass was doubling my line. It was clear and coherent, just really, really "BIG!!!" Those chambers certainly do something other than reduce weight!

Joel also told me that this was the finest sounding MTD he had played to date, and I also must concur. It just seems to do everything well, and it combines that almost supernatural clarity of an MTD with an ebony board with a big, huge, full tone - not to mention sustain for days!

As for weight, I weighed my 535 at 8.8 lbs. For comparison, the 435 is 8.4 lbs, the Skjold is 9.2 lbs, my 25th Anniversary 24F 5-string Sadowsky is 9.0 lbs (as is my Gibson Thunderbird), my Turner EL-535 is 9.4 lbs, and my DeArmond Pilot 5 Deluxe ties the 535 at 8.8 lbs. The lightweight of my stable (not counting semi-hollow bodies or ABG's) is my old Lotus 4-string at 7.6 lbs, and my Gibson Explorer and Corvette Standard 4-string fretless tie for heaviest honors at 10.6 lbs each!

Here is a shot from the gig. It's not the greatest quality, and does no justice at all to these fine instruments:



FWIW, the WWU powering the (4 ohm) VL-208 was my "rhythm guitar" rig - UniBass into Daddy-O, into the WWU. My "bass" rig was Kern IP-777 into Stewart World 2.1, into two (4 ohm) Low B-2's.

I recently got my custom wood knobs made for my by Pete Skjold (using wood from my actual redwood top!), and I am really happy with the results!






Later, Tom.

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Another Skjold in the works!

Okay, I admit it. I am totally hooked on Pete Skjold's basses! Some of you might have seen my thread regarding my Skjold Custom 5. Well, I just got off the phone with Pete and laid the groundwork for my Skjold Exotic Custom 4! It will be a 4-string (obviously!) with a Hipshot D-tuner for drop-D tunes. It will use the Skjold preamp and pickups, with an optional, hotter, bridge pickup.

For woods, I spent a lot of time talking to Pete about possibilities, and then my good buddy Juneau hoped over to Pete's shop to take some photos (thanks, Juneau!). Here is Pete with three of the "finalists":















Up against the wall behind him is a sweet chunk of maple burl. He is holding some uniquely flamed anigre, and this awesome piece of flamed mahogany, also called "fiddleback mahogany." This photo is really the one that did it for me, as it made the mahogany just jump out relative to the other two. Pete had just picked up that piece of wood the day Juneau took the photos, and both Pete and his supplier seemed very excited about it. I can see why!

Here are two more shots of the fiddleback mahogany:





























But to really appreciate this piece of wood, check out this little video that Juneau took. Or, as he says, "And now, this is the Fiddleback Mahogany taking its little turn on the catwalk!":

Mahogany on the catwalk

You can see how I am so smitten with this wood! It will grace both the front and back of my bass, as well as the headstock. The body wood will be spanish cedar (after much debate!), and Pete will incorporate two thick (3/16") veneers of flamed maple, and at least two darker veneers between the maple and the cedar (on both sides).

The neck will be a 7-piece, and we have yet to pick out the exact woods. We did spend a lot of time talking about fingerboard woods, though. After thoroughly discussing all of the tonal qualities of various options, as well as the esthetic impact, we decided upon ebony. We will also use ebony for the pickup cover, knobs, and for the neck pocket overlay. The fingerboard dots will be flame maple, and I plan on incorporating a Norse symbol (also in flame maple, and in honor of Pete's Viking heritage!) on the neck pocket overlay.

[Updated 7/16/05]

Okay, the top, back, and laminates have all been glued, and the rough cut of the body is done. Here are some shots of the initial stages of my new Exotic Custom 4 (courtesy of Juneau, as always!). You can also see the ebony fingerboard, which Pete put in the picture for a little persepective.



In these two shots, you can see a bit more of what the spanish cedar body wood adds to the equation/





And here is a shot of the back.



The coloration of the mahogany is a bit more ruddy than it looked from the other photos, but I think it provides even more contrast to the ebony. I am really excited by the look of the cedar, too. I wasn't sure what to expect, there. And the flame maple veneers really add a lot, I think.

Here is a shot of the 7-piece neck blank:



Thanks again, Juneau!

[Content added on 7/20/05]

Well, I have a few new developments. As you may recall, Pete and I had talked about doing some Norse symbol inlay options, and we were initially thinking about having him doing it using flame maple.

After a while, though I decided that I wanted him to do not only the Hammer of Thor symbol on the neck pocket overlay, but to also do the "Gungnir" symbol in place of the dot position markers. Gungnir was Odin's spear, and the symbol looks like this:



So, we are now talking about doing these in gold pearl (which I did not know existed, but as described, it sounds like an awesome match for this bass). Needless to say, I am even more psyched!

[time passes...]

Well, here we have the finished inlay!



[more time passes!]

New photos from Juneau!



This photo highlights both the fact that we have switched from the single C4 pickup configuration to dual pickups. It also shows the custom Skjold bridge (I think this is one of the first basses to sport this bridge!).











Here are more progress shots:

















More update shots [10/10/05]:

The neck is now fitted to the body.





This shot shows the gold pearl side dot markers (to match the gold pearl inlay):



[11/21/-5]

Some more update shots, after the finish has been sprayed:





More updates! It's getting close!








Thanks again, Juneau!

Okay, I have been having fun with this bass over the weekend, but I was only able to play it loud today at lunch. Whoa, Momma! I could tell from playing it through my Baby Blue II that this thing just plays, and it is so very comfortable for both hands. Oh, and did I mention fast? This thing makes even a schmuck like myself think he can play fast!

Tonally, it definitely sounds like a Skjold, but compared to my Custom 5, it has a more aggressive high end (which it should, considering the ebony board on the 4 and the bubinga fingerboard on the 5), and a different midrange voice. The Custom 5, with its mahogany body, is a bit more 'organic' and slightly warm (but very clear) through the mids. The Exotic Custom 4 speaks more like my '73 Jazz, with a bit of aggressiveness and a 'forward' kind of attack. In fact, the 4 sounds very reminiscent of my '73 Jazz in many ways. The overall vibe is quite similar, though the Jazz is even more high end snappy (having a maple fingerboard) and the Skjold is definitely more balanced through the mids. Come to mention it, the feel of the neck on this bass reminds me more of my '73 Jazz than anything else.

Here are some shots of the three Skjold's (Stage 4, Custom 5, Exotic Custom 4) hanging out. Please note that Pete wasn't done with my ebony knobs yet, so he shipped it with black metal knobs.









Here are some more shots. I love what Pete does with fingerboards! Check out the birdseye on the Stage.



And the inlays on the Exotic Custom 4 were just what I had in mind!



A few more comments after playing this bass some more...

On the electronics front, there are two "new" design features at work on this bass. First, Pete now offers an optional "hotter" bridge pickup, which I believe was designed to offer better balance between the two pickups (am I right, Pete?). I am not sure how much of what I am hearing as the difference between my Exotic Custom 4 and my Custom 5 is related to this pickup (versus the different woods and strings), but the overall tone is definitely more aggressive and there is a "snap" to the attack (even on the lower notes) that you don't quite hear from my 5. My presumption is that the different "attacks" on my 4 and 5 is perhaps more due to this hotter bridge pickup than it is due to the woods involved.

At any rate, they both sound great, but different, to my ears. What is even more amazing is the range of tones offered by the pickup selector switch. I am normally a fan of the vol/vol pot configuration, and I was skeptical at first about not having the control that I am used to, but the ability to drive the pickups in series or parallel is well worth it. You get two very distinct tones this way. I hope I have my "series/parallel" settings right (again, help me out if I'm wrong, Pete!) but in parallel mode, it's a bit more refined and in series, it's a bit more aggressive (and very slightly louder). Oftentimes, when I play through different amp/cab combos, switching from series to parallel (or vice versa) can take an "okay" tone and make it really gel. Also, series setting in passive mode just kicks with an all-tube rig!

The other new feature (relative to my Custom 5, at least) is the newly voiced Skjold preamp (made to Pete's specs by John East). The frequency range on the parametric midrange now encompasses a wider range, and goes all the way down to 100 Hz. This one tone control is hugely powerful. You have boost/cut, and control over the frequency. But whatever Q setting John/Pete use, it tends to not screw up your sound (which is sometimes easier to do than you might think when you start messing with parametric EQ's). This parametric midrange is worth the price of admission, alone, for this preamp! But no, it doesn't stop there! You may be familiar with John East's preamps in general, but I want to mention the bass control on this preamp. It is a boost only, but uniquely (to the best of my knowledge), as you turn it up, not only does the boost increase, but it also starts to boost progressively deeper notes (again, Pete, keep me straight if I am wrong, here). What I have found is that quite simpley, this bass boost just works better. You can fill in the lows to the extent needed without getting boomy/muddy in one particular range. I'm not sure exactly what is going on here from a physics perspective, but all I can say is that in practice, this bass knob seems to do a better job of dialing in "good" low end and avoiding any "problems" you may sometimes encounter when boosting lows.

Wow, I know that I am rambling on, but one more comment, if I may. While it may not necessarily look like a Jazz, Pete has told me several times that he has spent some time thinking about what makes those vintage J's sound/play so good, and I think he's drawn on more than a bit of their mojo, here. If you close your eyes, this neck feels a lot like a vintage Jazz (in fact, Pete based his shape on measurements from a vintage Jazz), it hangs like a J-bass (again, on purpose), and in parallel/passive mode, this thing really captures a lot of the mojo that I hear from my '73 Jazz. The mids are very similar, and the low-mids to lows are again reminiscent, but more balanced on the Skjold. Highs are very much in the same ballpark, though the maple board on my Jazz is certainly brighter. But this does not mean that the Skjold is a one-trick pony. Far from it. I think that Pete's basses are probably some of the most tonally flexible instruments I have played. But if you want to be able to dial in a great J-Bass tone (among other tones), you can certainly do it on this bass (and on my Custom 5, too, but the Exotic Custom 4 gets a tad closer).

That's it for now. Thanks for letting me rant, y'all. I'm just awefully excited about this drop-dead-gorgeous, awesome playing instrument!

Here are some more shots from Juneau:







Hopeless Skjold addict, Tom.

Monday, February 27, 2006

GTG at the Bowlus Ranch

The GTG was a huge success! You can read all about it on this thread over at TalkBass.com. When the dust settles, I will try to post a condensed version of what when down here. All I can say is that this was really a great event, and there was a lot of great gear, great players, and great comraderie on hand. Putting a face and a handshake to a screen name is pretty darn cool, and everyone who showed up got along really well.

There are some photos on the TB thread, but here is a link to some of the videos I shot:

GTG Videos

Tom.

Sunday, January 08, 2006

Welcome to Bowlus Bass Blog!

Well, after some external encouragement, I have decided to give this whole "blog thing" a try, and I hope to use this vehicle to consolidate some of my thoughts, comments, and experiences with various bass gear. I have posted a fair amount on TalkBass.com, which is a fantastic resource. I am also currently a freelance reviewer for Guitar World's Bass Guitar Magazine (I've been in every issue since I came on board midway through 2006), so I will reserve some of my comments (at least initially) for my print reviews.

Please let me know if you find this useful, and/or if you have any comments.

Take care, Tom.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Bergantino "Intelligent" Powered Cabs (IP Series)

Well, for some time now, I have been telling a few of you to hold off on any major gear purchases, because I was “in the know” with regard to a very exciting item coming down the pike. I have now been given the “green light” to go ahead and discuss this with my fine friends here. at TalkBass.com, and elsewhere! I am thrilled to be able to share this information, as I really do think that we have something special on our hands, here. The "mystery gear" in question is a new line of powered cabs from Jim Bergantino. I have been demoing (and ended up buying) a powered 322 (called the IP322) for some time now. It has a 1,000w (into 4 ohm) Class AD, switching power supply amp built into the back of the cab. This amp adds only 7 lbs to the overall weight, and would be reason enough for joy. But, Jim has also incorporated a DSP front end (with two "programs" to choose from) which provides tremendous EQ-ing possibilities. What Jim is doing is taking very detailed measurements of his cabs, and then crafting an EQ to make the cab as close to "flat" as possible [sort of – see below]. I know that this raises all kinds of concerns as to whether or not “flat” is good, but let me assure you, this is something different (and better, IMHO) than what we've seen/heard before. Prior to this, I had heard some cabs that I have thought of as being fairly “flat” which sound extremely "clear", but which are not as full sounding as some other cabs. Other cabs, which I have thought of as “flat” were very full sounding, but were not as clear as this first group. There are even other cabs, which kind of pick their part of the frequency range to hit clarity, and perhaps another part to hit fullness. Each approach has its merits, and in truth I have heard a growing number of cabs which do a very good balancing act between “clear” and “full,” while achieving decent tonal balance. And let me say that in general, I am a fan of cabs that don’t introduce a lot of coloration on their own, but rather allow me a “blank canvas” upon which to either draw my own tonal colors, or upon which to hear the nuances of my individual instruments.

But these new IP-series cabs from Bergantino take all of this to a new level. You get extreme clarity, with a full, balanced tone that just feels really "together" and cohesive. When Jim first described this idea to me (powered cabs with DSP EQ), my brain really started clicking, and I formed some pretty high expectations of what this setup could sound like. So, by the time that I was able to actually hear the IP322 in person, I was already pretty geeked, and my expectations were very high. Even so, when I fired it up, it took my brain a while to realize just what I was hearing. With most other gear that I audition, I find myself listening for the little “extra this” or the “slightly diminished that” which add up to present the particular sonic character of an individual piece of gear. Listening to the IP322, it took me a while to realize that I wasn’t hearing “too much this” or “too little that”, but rather “just enough of everything.” I felt like Goldilocks and that third bowl of porridge! ;^] And of course, it has been an incredible tool for comparing/contrasting preamps and instruments!

Now, it is unavoidable to say, “but Tom, not everyone likes a flat sounding cab, so even though you’re psyched, I may not like this!” True enough. I am positive that these cabs will not be for everyone. We are a diverse group, all with our own preferences. But, I do want to say again that this is “flat” like I’ve never heard it. There is no sacrifice of fullness for clarity’s sake, or vice versa. The sound is very “alive” and dynamic, so don’t even think of your father’s Oldsmobile (or anything else which you might consider to sound “sterile”, etc.). I think that this sense of immediacy and dynamics says a lot for the quality of the amp inside these boxes. It certainly performs better than I would have expected out of a switching mode power supply. Of course, a well engineered speaker enclosure doesn’t hurt, either!

I did have a chance to try the amp section with my HT112/EX112. The DSP wasn’t dialed in for this combo, but one of the programs on the amp I had happened to be pretty close, so Jim encouraged me to give it a try. I wanted to compare the IP amp to the Walter Woods Ultra (especially since I really love the sound of the WWU with the HT112/EX112). Well, as good as the WWU sounds driving these cabs, the IP amp was several notches better, IMHO. The combo was much more punchy and present than with the WWU, and the upper mids and highs seemed just as sweet to me (though to be honest, the Woods does have some subtle coloration that makes for a “different”, though not in my opinion any “better”, tone). The low mids were definitely stronger, and the overall feel was more forceful and dynamic, but still remained open and airy. Fellow TBer’s Cory and emjazz were able to hear the IP112 by itself and with the EX112, so I’m sure they will chime in.

I’m not sure what Jim has in mind with the two channel option, but one route would be to offer a "flat" setting and another, say "punchier" setting – we tried this at one point (Jim dialed up a “punchier” tone via the DSP), and it was pretty freakin’ cool! As mentioned, Jim will be offering this amp in the HT112 (called IP112), and in this case, you can drive an EX112 with the amp (for a total 4 ohm load). In this case, one setting could be for using the IP112 alone, with another for using it with the EX112. The IP322 will not be an official product (I own the only one - for now at least!), but Jim will be offering – GET THIS!!! – IP310's and IP212's!!! These cab configurations are smaller than his previous HT212/HT310 (probably very close to the size of the 310UL), and I think that they will weigh in around 85 lbs. I am super excited about these new cabs. Both can be DSP’d to sound “flat”, but you do hear the different characteristics of the particular drivers (10’s just sound different from 12’s). Cory and emjazz got to hear these as well, and I think they had a pretty good time!

As for the “relatively flat” thing, it is my understanding that these cabs are not designed to be flat down to 20 Hz, or anything super low like that. The amplifier power and cone excursion required would be significant, I would think, and at this point, the low end might overpower the mids/highs. So, I think that there is a certain low frequency point below which the cabs are not technically “flat”. But Jim is able to dial in the EQ to make them realistically “flat” which gives the cabinet an octave to octave balance I’ve never heard in another amp/cab combination. I think that perhaps “tonally balanced” is a better way to think of this. And of course it is possible to dial in some “punch”, or perhaps a low-pass filter, or who knows what. It’s up to Jim to decide just how to program these DSP channels. All I know is that the “tonally balanced” setting is really something special, and has opened my eyes to what can be accomplished by a bass rig, both live and in the studio.

Speaking of live use, I have been able to gig out with the IP322 in three different rooms. The first room I tried had a boomy stage, and after conveying this experience to Jim, he added the variable high pass filter to my line driver. Problem solved! And to be certain, this was not a “problem” with the IP322. The stage was just very resonant, and it made certain parts of the stage area sound very bassy and boomy. But, with the VHPF, I can dial out those offending low frequencies without changing my tone (weird, but true!). The other two venues were pretty good, acoustically, and the IP322 sounded awesome! Actually, the last venue (played just last Saturday night) has given me problems with boominess from other rigs, but just kicked bootay with the powered Berg. I was able to keep up with two loud guitarists and a medium loud drummer with no problems.

Oh, and one more thing that’s pretty neat. While the IP322 can crank out the volume when you need it, it also allows my tone to have the sense of dynamics and force that I crave, but at lower volumes, too. Previously, I had to get a certain level of volume before I’d really hear/feel that special “impact” and “girth”, but the IP322 seems able to capture this at nearly any volume level. Very nice!

If I sound overly excited about this line of amps from Bergantino, it is because they represent, IME/IMHO, probably the best sounding solid state rig I have heard. Some of my other absolute favorite combinations might get close, but I can’t think of any off hand that equal the sound of the IP322 – and certainly none exceed it (again, IMHO, and for my personal preferences). Of course, if you are into the tube sound, then there are other routes to take, but for solid state, this is a good as it gets, IMHO.

And the mandatory disclaimer: I do not work for Jim Bergantino or Bergantino Audio Systems, nor am I affiliated with them in any way. I’m not a dealer, I’m not a rep, nada. I am a satisfied user, and I am also fortunate enough to have a good deal of gear on hand. This is why Jim wanted me to give the IP322 a listen. When I heard how good it was, I asked if I could buy it, and I did pay a fair price to Jim for this demo unit, so no “free” or even “discounted” gear has exchanged hands. Y’all know that I love my EA gear as well as several other brands (and I still do), so I hope you accept this post as my truthful opinion.

To be honest, I think of this as quite a bold move by Jim, and I think he could be onto something really, really good. Sure, there are other powered cabs out there, but I don’t think anything really directly compares, and this is without factoring in what you can accomplish with the DSP. Your opinion may vary greatly from mine, and that’s cool. They are sure to be too expensive for some, too heavy for some, too “non-scooped” for some, but personally, I am as excited about this new line of cabs as I possibly could be.

All I can say is that I strongly encourage anyone looking to pick up a new rig to give these cabs a try. There’s no way that you can even appreciate them without hearing them (and hearing them at least twice, if possible!).

Check out the Bergantino website for more information.
There you go, Tom.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

1x10/1x8 Shootout

Well, I've been through the 2x10's, and now we're looking and those cute little 1x10's and 1x8's! Are they useful for anything other than as a paper weight? Can you make them jump off the floor when you slap a low B? Let's find out!

Here is the rundown on the competition (in alphabetical order):

Accugroove Tri 110 (250w, 8 ohm, 43 Hz to 18 kHz, 100 db, 42 lbs, 21.75" x 15.25" x 16.25")

Acme Low B-1 (175w, 8 ohm, 41 Hz to 22 kHz, 90 db, 31 lbs, 15.75" x 15.75" x 13")

EA CxL-110 (350w, 8 ohm, 48 Hz to 14 kHz, 103 db, 29 lbs, 13.5" x 14.75" x 12.5")

EA VL-108
(200w, 8 ohm, 58 Hz to 15 kHz, 95 db, 27 lbs, 13.5" x 14.5" x 10.5")

EA VL-110 (250w, 8 ohm, 41 Hz to 15 kHz, 95 db, 37 lbs, 13.75" x 17.5" x 14.5")

Epifani T-110UL
(250w, 8 ohm, 45 Hz to 16 kHz, 99 db, 23 lbs, 13.75" x 17" x 12.5")

Hevos Midget
(400w, 4 ohm, 40 Hz to 20 kHz, 97, 14 kg)

Low Down Sound 3-way 1x8 (250w, 8 ohm, 14" x 14" x 14")

Raezer's Edge Bass 10 (200w, 8 ohm, 50 Hz to 5 kHz, 98 db, 30 lbs, 17" x 14" x 11")

And the required group photos. This first shot is more or less straight on, and tries to show the relative proportions of the cabs (but I had to go without flash to avoid glare):



This shot was taken with flash, and does a better job of showing the driver configurations (and the nice blue baffle board on the LDS cab!), but since it is taken on an angle, it makes the LDS 1x8 look bigger than it is, and the Tri 110 look smaller than it is:




As with my 2x10 shootout, I have positive feelings towards each of these cabs (which is why I bought them in the first place!), so my comments in general will tend to be positive for each cab. Plus, I'm a "glass is half full" kind of guy. So, please bear with me!

The “testing equipment” again included my Skjold Custom 5 (which is the instrument that I am the most familiar with right now, and a very clear, yet full-sounding, instrument), into a line driver (with variable high pass filter, which was turned all the way off for these tests) built by Jim Bergantino, into a Crest CA9 (not bridged! ).

No guessing games this time! Here were my impressions (again, in alphabetical order):

Accugroove Tri 110
- I should point out that this is not the current offering (which is the Tri 110L). The "L" is both lighter, and is rated at 300w. I had asked Mark about "upgrading" to the neo 10" driver, but he felt that there wasn't much to be gained, so I stuck with the ceramic driver. This cab sounds very quick, with lots of upper midrange presence, though the highs themselves are not as brilliant and bright as on some of the other cabs (if you've heard Accugroove's smooth silk dome tweeters, you know what I am talking about). It has a definite "bark" and strong attack to each note, but it does not go as deep or sound as full as many of the others. Fast, quick transients are more its forte than is thick fundamental. For that reason, I find it to be a great companion cab to the Tri 210L.

Acme Low B-1 - This cab was not as loud as the others, and it's no surprise that Acme cabs are not very efficient. They do go quite deep, though, and the Low B-1 does not disappoint. However, its low end was not as forceful and full as that of the VL-110. The high end is very smooth, yet plenty clear. It also has a strong upper midrange presence (with its "emphasis" being voiced a tad bit lower than that of the Tri 110), and by comparison, it actually makes the Epifani sound somewhat mid scooped. On the whole, its low end was not as full as the VL-110, nor was its high end as bright as the EA's (and other cabs').

EA CxL-110 - Compared to its predecessor, the VL-110, the CxL-110 has more upper mids and high end, but is not as strong down low. It is still a fairly full, slightly dark sounding (but less so than the VL) cab, and has many similarities to the VL-110. I didn't feel that it sounded quite as smooth as the VL, either. But again, its overall clarity surpasses that of the VL-110.

EA VL-108
- This cab did not have the super brightness of the T-110UL, but otherwise had a similar amount of high end clarity and content. It was not as full sounding in the lows as the Epifani, but seemed more present throughout the mids (and also made the Epi sound slightly scooped by comparison). It sounds more smooth, and a tad darker, than the LDS 1x8. While not as big on the low end as the larger 1x10's, this diminutive 1x8 does present an amazingly full, solid sound.

EA VL-110 - This has been my "gold standard" when it comes to 1x10's for some time, but after this shootout, I think it needs to share that stage with the Epifani. The VL-110 sounds full, slightly round, and slightly dark. I think of it as offering "smooth clarity." It is definitely a cab that takes well to being driven hard (where I tend to prefer it to the Epifani), but at lower volumes, it can sound a bit too reticent, and slightly congested (which is where I tend to prefer the Epifani). Still, and all around excellent performer, in my book.

Epifani T-110UL - As mentioned, I believe this to be the same cab currently offered as the "UL110" (the "T-110UL" nomenclature was used back before the "NYC" label started to be used for the ceramic driver based cabs). This cabs sounds kind of like a cross between the Hevos Midget and the VL-110. It has nicely balanced mids (despite the fact that by comparison, some cabs made it sound slightly scooped; this is more of a "midrange push" from the other cabs, IMHO), and its low end is similar to the Midget's low end at lower volume (the Midget did better handling higher volumes). The Epifani tweeter is really open and airy, with a sweet woodiness to them. They tend to float on top of your sound, and are really somewhat unique, IME. Only the Hevos was more bright/brilliant on the high end, but the Epi was more smooth sounding. In fact, the general sound of the T-110UL is fairly smooth, though without any of the "darkness" I associated with the VL-110. Its low end is fairly full, though not as forceful on the low B as with the VL-110. As mentioned previously, the Epi really shines at lower to mid volumes, but when you push it pretty hard, the lows first start to roll off (relative to the mids and highs), and if you keep pushing, the low end can get rather ugly and out of control. But this is really loud stuff, and up to this point, it's a top notch 1x10. If you need to really slam a 1x10, then the Hevos or VL-110 are the top choices.

Hevos Midget - The low end is of similar depth, but not as full or big, as that of the VL-110. The midrange it tight and crisp, though definitely somewhat scooped sounding. This cab is super tight (including on the low B), and has exceptional clarity which really projects. It can be driven quite hard and still maintain its composure. This was the only 4 ohm cab of the group.

Low Down Sound 3-way 1x8 - This little 14" cube seems to go deeper than the VL-108, but is not as full sounding. You can definitely hear some port "chuffing" on the B string, but I didn't hear any from E on up. It has super clear mids which are very reminiscent of the VL-108. In fact, it sounds more clear than the EA 1x8 at lower volumes, but as you turn it up, you reach a point where this trend reverses, and the VL-108 becomes more clear. The VL-108 definitely takes to a low B better, and sounds more balanced on the whole than the LDS cab. Low to mid volume clarity is definitely the strong point of this LDS beauty.

Raezer's Edge Bass 10 - First off, let me just take a minute to say that Rich Raezer was a heck of a nice guy to work with, and he will be sorely missed. He builds some killer cabs, too, and is probably best known in the acoustic/folk realm. The Bass 10 is a tweeterless design, and you definitely hear this. The lack of a tweeter actually makes it sound a bit veiled up top, but you do get used to this. The lows are not quite as deep as, say the Acme, but they are as full as any of the 1x10's, and also incorporates some of the Tri 110's bite. The mids are warm and full, but not muddy, and similar overall to those of the VL-110, but with even more midrange push, more warmth, and slightly less clarity than the EA. You can't help but think of a P-bass with flats when playing through this cab! It has it's own vibe, but if this is your sound, the Bass 10 is very compelling.

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

My Skjold Custom 5

Well, I have bantered about and wasted bandwidth on too many other threads, and I need to just consolidate my comments here in one thread. Let me start off with a bit of background on what I was looking for in an instrument. I had been somewhat interested in a "custom" bass for some time, but as many of you know, I am quite enamoured with my Thunderbird, so it wasn't until I began playing 5 string that I really got the hankering for a custom bass. As I have lots left to learn on 4-string, I had been resisting the lure of the low B for some time, but as the 5-string gained popularity, sooner or later I knew I had to join the crowd. But, I wanted to be sure that I would like it before I plunked down any serious cash. So, I jumped on a great deal on a leftover new DeArmond Pilot 5 Deluxe (and later swapped out the electronics for Bartolini pickups and an Aguilar OBP-1). As it turns out, this relatively cheap bass is a nice playing instrument, and soon, I found myself fairly comfortable on a fiver, and looking for a true, quality instrument. And let me tell you, I played a ton of them! What I could not seem to find was an instrument that felt good in my hands, played well, and sounded good to me. I'd get one aspect or the other, but not all three. Or, I'd find one that I thought fit the bill, but when I compared it to my modified DeArmond, I prefered the Pilot, so why spend more money? This went on for probably two years, with some more casual 5-string auditioning taking place before I bought my DeArmond.

So, with all that background, I find myself in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area on business, and I decided to stop in and see this maker, Pete Skjold, whom I had read so much about here on TalkBass. If nothing else, I had to see if the headstock on his basses was really as huge as everyone seemed to think! Well, Pete and Ron were both hard at work when I showed up, but both of them stopped and took a great deal of time to talk to me and show me around their shop. I liked both of them instantly, and they really seemed genuinely interested in our conversation, even though I told them up front that I was planning on playing a number of basses before deciding which one to buy. I also told them up front that I am a pretty dedicated fan of neck-through basses (to which Pete replied something like, "Well, just give one of ours a try and let me know what you think."), so I was initially quite skeptical about getting a bolt-on. But, I became much more optimistic when I began talking about my love of mahogany as a body wood. Pete immediately agreed and started telling me all the things he loved about mahogany, and showed me several basses with mahogany bodies. We talked woods for quite a while, and he showed me the great selection of body, top, fingerboard, and other woods which he has in stock. Talking to Ron was really great, too, and it is immediately apparent that this guy knows his woodworking. Super nice guy, too.

But, the real magic began when I had the chance to play his basses. The first thing I noticed was that they just felt really good in my hands, and that it was comfortable for me to play anywhere on the fingerboard. His 5 string basses felt really natural to me, and I think a lot of 4-string guys would also be quite happy with them. The next thing I noticed was the quality of the construction and the georgeous finishes. I nearly had to break out a bib to control the drooling! I was able to play a variety of his finished instruments (every one he had in the shop!), and this was really enlightening, as I could tell the sonic differences between body woods, fingerboard woods, pickup types and preamp types. They all sounded really, really good, but what really blew me away were the instruments with the custom Skjold pickups and the Skjold-spec East preamp. If you like the sound of Bartolini or EMG pickups and preamps, then you will love them in Pete's basses. But, if you want the utmost in transparency and tonal flexibility, the Skjold electronics are the only way to go!

So, after playing all of these basses (through four different Schroeder cabs!), I began talking more with Pete about what I was looking for in a bass, and what options I might consider, if I were to get a Skjold bass. I figured I would get back to him in a couple of months, if I did decide to go with one of his basses. Mahogany was a given for the body wood, and after playing a bunch of his basses, I decided that bubinga was my preferred fingerboard material. So, he's showing me some big chunks of mahogany, then we look at necks (I really liked his 5-7 piece necks), then he shows me a knockout slab of bubinga, and it hits me... These chunks of wood we are looing at will become my bass! It really did just hit me. I mean, here I am loving the way Pete's basses play, loving the way they sound, and then really seeing these pieces of wood coming together into an instrument, and it finally just clicked. I asked Pete if he could fit one more bass into his current batch, and he said that there was just enough time to sneak one more in. The clincher was when we were looking through top woods to match up with the mahogany and I saw this lonely old piece of rose myrtle over in the corner. It was all over at that point. I had to have this bass!

So, Pete spends a bunch more of his time with me going over what I want (options, etc.), and we come up with some of the ideas like using the same wood as the fingerboard (bubinga) for the knobs, to provide some contrast (which I think turned out great). He told me that he is switching to a more narrow pickup cover, but I prefer to anchor my thumb on a wider pickup cover, so we stick with the old covers on mine, and so on...

A few weeks later, I get to see my first photos of my bass in progress:



and



Even though they are small photos, of a bass very early in its development, I am understandably quite excited at this point!

Next, I get a few more enticing "progress shots."



and



At this point, I am even more fired up, because I am totally stoked at how good the bass looks, especially that fingerboard. Unfortunately, some bad news was due to come my way...

Pete calls me up and lets me know that there is a problem with the necks on this batch of basses. The issue is related to the compound radiusing that they were using, and for reasons that I don't fully understand, this batch of necks had a slight "stair stepping" of the frets, which required them to adjust the neck angle slightly to keep the frets from buzzing. As I understand it, the differences here were extremely minor, and probably not visible to the naked eye, but Pete and Ron knew they were there. They did work out a solution, but it required raising the action very slightly. Chances are, it would have been fine, but it was not perfect in their mind, so they redid all of the necks on the basses in that batch. Unfortunately, they did not have another matching piece of bubinga for my fingerboard, though they did have more from the same piece of wood. Here is a photo posted by my good bud, Juneau, showing the old neck next to the new fingerboard:



I was so in love with that first fingerboard, that initially, I was kind of bummed with the new board, but it started to grow on me. Especially after Juneau posted some more shots of its progress:




And while he was at it (and the neck was off), he got some more shots of the body:







And I really started to dig the new fingerboard when I first saw pictures of it on the body (thanks again, Dave!):



The shots from Juneau continue:







This shot shows the nice flame maple dots:




Okay, so I finally get the bass in my hands last Wednesday, and the real payoff begins! [Note: some of this information is paraphrasing what I have posted in other threads.] I had a little bit of time to play it here at the office before heading home for lunch, and I was immediately very impressed. Visually, my first thoughts were that the photos do not do it justice. The subtle flaming in the rose myrtle top is very 3D and moves depending on the angle you look from. It also really varies with the lighting. The finish is very deep, and nicely done. I'm not sure if you can tell or not, but it has a red burst around the edges.

After playing it for just a bit, I intially thought that I would have to tweak the setup slightly for Ohio's climate, but after it had a chance to "recover" from the shipping process, the action is now pretty darn close to what I would call perfect (and I didn't have to do a thing!).

I asked Pete to make the neck as thin as possible, and boy did he deliver! I liked the fairly thin neck on my DeArmond Pilot 5 Deluxe, and this neck is even more thin, but still feels very sturdy, and really fits well in my hand. The neck is not as wide as the one on my Pilot, and this is taking a little getting used to, but it definitely enhances playability, and I am liking the slightly closer string spacing.

As to how it sounds, the first thing I noticed was that it speaks very well unplugged. You could probably learn/write a song on this thing unplugged, you can hear yourself that well. Very balanced and rich sounding. The fresh strings (nickel plated steel, roundwound) help, I am sure, but that aside, it still sounds great and is very loud unplugged. Once I plugged it in, I was surprised at how much high end this instrument has. Again, new strings make a difference, but even accounting for that, it's still brighter than I expected. Being made from mahogany, I expected a full, yet tight, low-mid presence, and good overall tonal balance, and it certainly has both. But the high end clarity still caught me somewhat by surprise (pleasantly, so). During most of my initial playing, I left the passive tone bleed set about halfway, and this seemed perfect. [Note: the highs seemed to have tamed down just a tad from the first day that I played it, though they are still very clear and speak very well - but I now just crank back a little on the "vintage tone control."]

The overall tonal character hit me as complex, airy, woody, and articulate. The low B was very, very tight and clear. Tonally, it is very well balanced, and I like the passive tone very well. I did notice, though, that the volume takes a pretty noticeable jump when you kick it into active mode, though, so I'll have to keep that in mind at gigs. I asked Pete about this, and he said that it's just a matter of the gain being up slightly on the preamp. This is adjustable, but he felt that it might be nice to have a slightly hotter signal for some amps, and of course you can back off a bit on the volume if this is too much.

The pickup selector knob (neck only, both in series, both in parallel, and bridge only) yields a huge range of tones just by itself, and the "Made to Skjoldspecs by John East" preamp offers a crazy variety of tonal options. The cool thing is, that the way Pete has selected his pickup windings and the way that he has tweaked the East preamp specs, you almost can't find a bad tone from this instrument! The pickups are very transparent, and Pete was trying to capture the best of the Jazz Bass pickup sound, but took great care to avoid having the pickups add anything (frequency-wise). The preamp is also designed to be very transparent, and the active tone is quite similar to the passive tone (with volume compensated), though the tone does get somewhat more full and tight in active mode (perhaps from a slight impedance change, or from removing the draw of the instrument cable on the pickups?).

It's early in the relationship (perhaps I should call it a "love affair!" ), so more detailed thoughts will come later, but I will say that after playing a bunch of Pete's basses, I pretty much knew what to expect, and got what I wanted. The things that really stand out about this bass is the thin, comfortable neck (more on that later!), and the fact that it is somewhat brighter than I would have expected from a mahogany body. It is exceedingly clear, tight and articulate, and I have never heard harmonics like I am able to get from this bass. They sound more easily, seem more true to the note, and are much louder than on any other bass I have tried. But the clarity is what is really amazing me. Most of my gear is pretty capable of creating tight, clear, accurate bass tone, and the Skjold Custom 5 is taking that tone to unheard of (by my ears) heights.

As a result of this clarity, I am finding that this bass just loves tube amps. The setup that I first played my Skjold through was my DB 359 into a Whappo, Jr. The Jr. is a great cab to use with tube amps, and this combo was tonal nirvana! At our gig last Saturday, I played it through a combined SS/Tube rig, with my Aguilar 680/728 powering the Whappo, Jr., and a Crest CA9 driving a Tri 210L on top of a Gordo. I also use a Pignose B-100V for a "rhythm guitar" rig (through an Akai UniBass).



Here are some more shots of the Skjold from that gig:





The low end on this bass is so tight, that the slight blurriness that I usually hear in the lows when using a tube amp (especially at higher volumes) was practically non-existent. Even the low B was tight, quick, and dynamically explosive through the 680/728. This rig sounds great with any bass, but with the Skjold, the clarity and tightness is truly amazing.

As stated, the love affair is very new, and I am sure that I will be on cloud 9 for some time. If I do encounter anything negative, I will be sure to report on it, though don't be surprised if you don't hear anything from me on this topic!

I also need to mention that Pete has called me and e-mailed me several times after I received my bass to be sure that I am happy. Great customer service!

A few notes that I forgot to add. One reason that I think that Pete's basses have such great high end and detail (with his electronics, at least) is that he uses a "pickup combination selector knob" instead of individual volume pots or a blend pot. This means that there is one (in the case of Vol/Vol) or two (in the case of Vol/Blend) less pots loading down the pickups and potentially (excuse the pun) bleeding out some of the high end. The pickup selector allows you to choose from neck only, both in series, both in parallel, or bridge only. Yes, you do lose the ability to dial in every possible blend variation, but the range of tones from these four choices is huge (and I love the series/parallel option). And the fact that you have less pots between the pickups and the output (in passive mode) or preamp (in active mode) seems to provide increased clarity and high end performance.

Another neat feature (especially in Pete's price range) is the locking input jack. I have to remember it's there, but I saw those a while back and I thought it was a great innovation.

One option that Pete offers which I thought was neat is the ability to have your straplock receptacles flush mounted, so there is no strap knob sticking out from the bass. A standard Strap Lock will snap right in. This option looks cool (if someone unusual), but I opted against it. I'd hate to show up for a gig and have a strap lock fail on me (or forget to bring the strap with the locks!). But, it is an interesting option, for those with better memories (and backup Strap Locks!).

One final note, and that is that I really like the lightweight Gator case that it came with. It has the proportions and inner lining of a hardshell case, but the outside is a cordura-like canvas, and it zips closed (instead of having a couple of latches). It is very light, but seems quite sturdy. I may pick one up for one of my other basses.

[Time passes...]

Well, I keep waiting for the honeymoon to be over before I get back here and post some follow ups, but I'll be darned if I ain't still head over heels in love!

In short, this bass is all that I had hoped, and a whole lot more.

But, for some more specific comments, I have to re-emphasis the clarity of this instrument. It is just phenomenal! And the kicker is that it is both clear and full sounding, which seems to be quite a feat, after playing many high end basses that were either one or the other. For the record, my new Sadowsky 25th is also full and clear sounding, but moreso than the Skjold on the "full" thing and less so than the Skjold on the "clear" thing.

The other highlight of this instrument has been its playability. I am primarily a fingerstyle player, and I find it to be very comfortable for this approach. The pickup covers make a great thumbrest (and are more comfortable than many). I asked Pete and Ron to make the neck as narrow as possible, and I really like what they delivered. Don't even think about the word "chunky" in the same room as this bass! Though if you did want your neck to feel like a Louisville Slugger, then I am sure that Ron and Pete could accommodate you, too!

Now that I do have my Sadowsky 25th Anniversary 24 Fret 5 string, it is inevitable to make comparisons between the Sadowsky and the Skjold. The added benefit of this is more practice time for me (which is sorely needed!). You are not going to get me to pick a favorite among these two basses, as I am really over-the-top thrilled with both of them. I mentioned, above, the full vs. clear thing, and will add that this carries over to the low B, too. The Sadowsky has a more massive "thump" on the low B, while the Skjold has a deep, percussive attack. Both basses are very flexible, tonally. I opted for two volume controls (versus volume/blend) on the Sadowsky, and I feel that this adds to the flexibility. Both necks are about the same thickness (thinness?), but the Sadowsky is somewhat wider. Both are great players. The craftsmanship and fit and finish on both are top notch, but I'd give a slight nod to the Sadowsky when it comes to the finish. It is my understanding that Pete is going to be switching to Polyester, which I believe is what Sadowsky uses, so he may close this gap (small as it is), but keep in mind, folks, that Sadowsky finishes are some of the best in the business!

Before receiving these basses, I had expected that the Skjold would be my "workhorse" and the Sadowsky would be kept in the vault. After seeing them both in person, I want to keep them both in the vault! After playing them both, I want to take them both to every show! However, I will probably stick with my original plan. Besides, now that my bandmates have heard me play out with my Skjold, they aren't about to let me leave it at home!

Here are some shots of the two "hanging out" together:





And if you ask me, I think it speaks very highly of Pete and Ron's work that my Skjold Custom 5 compares so well to a truly world-class instrument from Roger Sadowsky!

One thing that I forgot to point out. In the photos of my Skjold and Sadowsky, I tried to hang the basses such that the top of the necks were at approximately equal levels. This shows you how the body of the Skjold trims off very quickly after the bridge. This makes for a more compact body, and to a certain extent, it makes the headstock look big in certain photos. But, if you compare it to the Sadowsky's headstock, you can see that it is actually fairly compact.

One other thing about the "truncated" end of the Skjold is that with the way it balances (quite well, BTW), the neck is moved somewhat to the right, closer to your body, a very small amount. This has the effect of making 1st position an easier, more comfortable reach. It's quite easy to get used to, and I think on the whole, it enhances the playability.

Now, what kind of Skjold bass to get next? [To see that answer, check out my other post "Another Skjold in the Works!"

Well, it's been a while since I ranted and raved about my Skjold Custom 5, so I thought I would share a comment and some photos.

The comment: I am blessed to own a number of very excellent basses, and among all of them, my primary gigging axe is my Skjold Custom 5.

The photos (yes, with pyschadelic carpet background!): This is my first string change since I picked up this bass (shocking, I know!), and I like the black hardware, so I thought I would accentuate it a bit:
















Tom.

Friday, October 28, 2005

Sadowsky SA200 All-Tube Head

It should come as no surprise to some of you that I have a bit of a love affair with tube heads/amps, though I also really like a quality solid state amp (different horses for different courses). Well, my lastest "love" is an all-tube head spawned from the mind of Roger Sadowsky. When I first heard that Roger might be doing an all-tube head, I was very interested. Then, I learned that he intended on marketing this head primarily in Japan. Bummer... Fortunately, he decided to sell some direct here in the USA, and I eagerly grabbed one up. The amp is actually built by Dolf Koch (who also builds the Eden VT-300B), and I do feel that Dolf is an artist as well as an amp maker. His designs are elegant and austere, and to my eyes, the SA200 is his crown jewel. Here is a photo:



and the rear:



Once I got mine home, I immediately had to pair it up with my Bergantino NV215 and my Sadowsky 25th Anniversary 24 Fret 5-string:



These three pieces really work great together, and the net result is perhaps the best sounding (and looking!) rig that I have ever put together. I have more details at TalkBass.com, so if you are interested, please check out this thread:

The Eagle Has Landed!!! Sadowsky All-Tube Head!!!

More to come, including a mega all-tube head steel cage match!

Later, Tom.

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Trace Elliot V8 - The Holy Grail of Tube Heads?

After reading about how great the Trace Elliot V8 all tube head is, recently a friend of mine (thanks again, Steve!) turned me on to the fact that Shane at British Audio Service had a V8 for sale. What I didn't know until after talking to Shane is that this one was a NOS unit that had never been sold (other than to British Audio Service, of course)! The serial number is T0136/74/201. It is our believe that this tells us that it was unit #74, made in February of 2001. It has the square badge and Made in Britain on the back.

Here are some photos Shane sent me:

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/V8_1_front.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/V8_1_rear_2.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/V8_1_side.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/V8_1_side_r.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/V8_kt88x8.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.


For a very, very preliminary report, but I just had a chance to briefly play my new V8 over lunch, and I just had to report back. Being aware of the theory that it ain't mine until I post a picture, here are a couple of shots of the V8 with my "Super Wizzy" 2x12's made by Steve Azola:

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/V8-with-Super-Wizzy%27s.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

This shot sort of reminds me of a shot of a friend's V* with the two ACME Low B-2's which taunted me so...

And here is a shot with a flash that shoes some of the details a bit better:

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/V8-with-cabs.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

As you can see, one of the Super Wizzy's has its ports "stuffed." This is a means of being able to convert them from a ported to a sealed cab. For now, I think I will leave all the ports open.

Needless to say, this rig sounded good! Dang good! The V8 has certainly lived up to my expectations so far, but much, much more testing is due...

I recently (August 6th, 2005) had a chance to pair it up with my Bergantino NV215 at an outdoor gig. Man, do they sound great together!



But of course, in order to protect my baby, I had to have a nice case made up, right? Well, after much shopping around, I decided to have an Anvil case made for it, much like what The Ox used with his V8's. I am really happy with how it turned out:


The casters are removable.

Here's a shot inside. It fits very nicely, and slides in easily:



I have formed an e-mail "support group" of the proud, the few, the V8 owners. If you own a V8 and would like to be included in our group, send me an e-mail at tombowlus@hotmail.com.

Later, Tom.

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Sadowsky 25th Anniversary 24 Fret 5 String

Wow, that is a mouthful! Sadowsky 25th Anniversary 24 Fret 5 String! At any rate, it's a beautiful instrument, and it will soon be on its way to me! Here is what I have to go by so far.

First, Kevin Drexler (of Sadowsky Guitars) sent me these photos of my body blank:

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/body_212-1.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Then, when it came back from finishing, I received this update:

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/bowlus_finished.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Finally, I get a look at my finished bass! It has an ebony board, with abalone inlay, black hardware, and the pickups are wired Volume, Volume, instead of Volume, Blend. As with all 25th Anniversary instruments, it has a mahogany body and a AAAA koa top.

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/bowlus.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

It must have needed a quick truss rod adjustment, so Nino apparently gave it a quick fix!

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/nino_bowlus.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

I can't wait for it to come in! More to follow, for sure!

[time passes... slowly...]

My bass (officially known as # 4358, and 12 of 25 Anniversary instruments) came in on Friday, but I was out of town. I just had a chance to open the package. I was quite nervous at first, as the box has a sizable hole, and a long slash in it. Luckily, it appears that the instrument and case were unharmed.

As for the bass itself, I am speechless! The finish is about a gazillion times better in person! None of the photos have even come close to accurately conveying the visual impact. It feels and plays like a dream, too! I am here at work, so I don’t have an amp to play through, but I look forward to doing so tonight. I am not sure exactly what kind of strings they ship on these basses, but they feel nice and sound great acoustically.
I am riding on cloud 9 right now, which is saying something for a Monday!

Okay, it's been a couple of days, and I have more photos!




And here are some shots of my two "buds" hangin' out:

BTW, you can see my custom "Swizzy" cabs (Super Wizzy's!) made by Steve Azola behind these two fine instruments.


Some additional thoughts on the Sadowksy. Truly, the finish is even better than I had imagined. I've never seen flamed koa like that, and the folks at Sadowsky certainly finish these instruments beautifully! The neck is also very comfortable, and I love the finish. The bass is very comfortable to play, and it just feels great in my hands. But, the real magic comes when you plug this beauty in! I love the throaty, authoritative tone, and I find that the Vol./Vol. setup allows me to dial in a variety of tones. I have also noticed that on this bass, more than any other I have tried, you can really get a variety of tones by changing your right hand position. Very nice! So far, my favorite tone comes from plucking the strings at the end of the fingerboard, and with the bridge pickup slightly rolled off. Have I mentioned that I love this bass!

I have been wanting a Sadowsky bass for at least 14 years, though only recently have I reached a level of economic stability sufficient to actively pursue one. When I did learn that mahogany bodied instruments were not available, I was a bit bummed, but nevertheless, I remained committed to owning a Sadowsky bass some day. Upon learning of the 25th Anniversary models, it was - in every sense of the words - a dream come true. I find it commendable that Roger is not charging anything additional for these instruments. I view mine as a masterpiece of artwork, and as such, I shall endeavor to preserve it in pristine condition. Of course, this means that I will have to order another instrument from Roger and co. to gig out with. When I do, I just hope they don't make it too beautiful for me to take out of the house!

Monday, February 21, 2005

Preamp tubes in Mesa Walkabout

Some time back, I had an opportunity to run through a number of different preamp tubes in my Mesa Boogie Walkabout. The tubes at my disposal were as follows:

Mullard 12AT7/CV4024
JAN Phillips 12AX7
JAN GE 5751
Shuguang 12AX7C9
Telefunken ECC83 (smooth plate)
JJ ECC83S

The original Mesa tubes said "Russian 2" on them, but I don't know who made them.

Virtually all of the tubes mentioned above offered some kind of improvement over the stock tubes. However, most differences were very subtle.

The Mullard was by far the warmest sounding, and had a good deal of low mids - too much for the already mid-heavy Walkabout. Still, if you are looking to add some meat, the Mullard would certainly do that.

The JAN Phillips is a great all around tube. Very nicely balanced tonally, with good articulation.

The JAN GE 5751 also had good tonal balance and was a pleasant sounding tube - not harsh at all. However, with the reduced gain, it didn't overdrive as well as the others, which is something I like to do with the Walkabout.

The Shuguang was a bit of a surprise. Upon first firing it up, I thought that it might be the ticket. Very robust signal and tone, overdrives great. However, then I noticed that it was really bringing out the finger/string noise in a huge and somewhat obnoxious way. I don't know if this means that it was slightly microphonic, but it was not desirable. Too bad, because otherwise this tube has a lot of promise.

The Telefunken was the most articulate tube of the bunch, with a bit more upper mids than most. Very clean sounding tube with the Gain down and the Master up, and probably sounded the best of the bunch when overdriven. Good balance, too.

The JJ was very similar to the Tele. Not quite as articulate, but perhaps had sweeter high end. Overdrove quite well, though not as nice as the Tele.

By comparison, the stock Mesa tubes did not have as much articulation as any of the tubes above (though they were close to the Mullard in that regard), and the tone was not as coherent. They did overdrive quite nicely, though not as convincingly as the Tele or JJ. Granted, there wasn't a huge difference overall, but I would say that you can do better than the stock tubes, and it shouldn't cost you an arm and a leg.

Ultimately, it came down the JAN Phillips, the Tele, and the JJ. These three were the most similar sounding of the bunch. I ended up choosing the Tele for its articulation and best overdrive tone. The JJ would probably be my second choice, although the JAN Phillips was very, very comparable.

The Walkabout has a second tube which drives the MOSFETs, and after playing around a bit, I chose the JAN Phillips for that duty. It really is too bad that the Shuguang had that string noise thing going on, because it really kicked in the pre-MOSFET socket - most balls and gain of the bunch.

There are a lot of good tubes that I didn't get a chance to try, but there you have the results of my own very unscientific preamp tube shootout.

Hope this helps, Tom.

P.S.
I got my tubes from Doug's Tubes, and he was very helpful.

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Walkabout, Thunderfunk, iAMP 800, Walter Woods Ultra

Following a discussion of the Mesa Boogie Walkabout versus the Thunderfunk TFB-420, I decided to set up a little "test" using the heads that I had on hand. In general, my intial thoughts were that the Walkabout does get really loud for its 300w, but as for clean volume, the Thunderfunk definitely bests it. Still, with some cabs, the Walkabout can seem just about as loud, but if the cab is prone to break up at all, or if it is already a bit warmish in the lows, I think that the Thunderfunk does a better job driving it at volume. But the difference is mostly at the limits. In a scenario where you wouldn't be cranking the Thunderfunk, the Walkabout should also be providing satisfactory output. Conversely, if you find yourself in a situation where the Thunderfunk would be pushing its useable limits, you are probably beyond the limits of the Walkabout.

But, to the task at hand, I did manage to get my Walkabout back in my basement music room, along with a couple of other nice little heads. Here's a shot of the competition that I had on hand:

The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/img/66/5930/640/107_0773.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

We have the Thunderfunk holding up my iAMP 800, Walkabout, and the Walter Woods Ultra sitting on top. Despite the optical illusion, the Crest CA9 is actually sitting on the two VL-210's behind the Bergies (which I used for this comparison). You can also see my rack rig sitting on top of two NL-210's, which I had been comparing to the VL-210's (as reported in another thread).

I used the Bergies for this comparison, partly because another TBer had asked me about the Thunderfunk and Walkabout powering an HT112/EX112, and partly because my Whappo, Jr. and Tri 210L are currently blocked in by a number of other cabs (and some larger Christmas gifts in hiding). These comments, then, are not as directly applicable as I would like, However, I hope to drag out the Tri 210L and repeat the comparison. But, for those interested in how these four did with the Bergies, read on...

The Thunderfunk is very clean with the Bergs, and has slightly pronounced lower mids, and a fairly open, tight sound. Lows are well controlled, even on the Low B, but the lows are not quite as full as they are with the other heads. I was not able to push any of the heads to the point of volume breakup, as the ceiling tiles in my room would start shaking like crazy before any of the amps would break up, but the Thunderfunk certainly seemed like it was producing volume with relative ease. Tonally, it's a pretty good match for the Bergs, and probably an even better match for the Accugroove cabs.

The Walkabout had a very different tone from the Thunderfunk. The highs were not as extended, but the lows were more full and thick. The midrange was also quite present, but decidedley warmer and smoother. At its loudest point, I don't think that I would have had a lot more room to go before it started to breakup, but the tone was holding together reasonably well. The exception would be that the low B started to loose tightness at moderately loud settings. BTW, I did not do any EQ-ing, and did not try to dial out some lows to help avoid this, though I probably could have. All in all, at least with the Bergs, the Thunderfunk would be my preference.

Moving on to the iAMP 800, the EA head made the strange impression of not really making much of an impression. Let me try to explain. It just didn't seem to accentuate any part of the tone more or less than the remainder. At first, it seems kind of dull, to be honest. But then you realize that it's really a fairly impressive feat, though perhaps less exciting than some of the others. The iAMP 800 had lots of headroom, and kept everything nice and tight, even with a low B thumping away pretty hard. I had noticed before that the iAMP sounded good with the Bergies, and I still feel that it does, although again, it is not as initially "exciting" tonally as the Thunderfunk. I will add that I have used the iAMP 800 many times with my Accugroove cabs, and it sounds incredible - especially when driving both as 4 ohm cabs for a 2 ohm total load.

But, once I plug the Walter Woods into the Bergies, it is really no contest. This is the head for these cabs. Highs are airy and open. Mids are sweet, clear, present, and very refined. Lows are full and thick, and plenty tight. With other cabs, I have noticed that the WWU is not as tight in the low end as my iAMP 800, but with these Bergies, it shows no such deficiency. Volume is noticeably easier to come by with the WWU's 1,200 watts, and I have every reason to believe that if allowed to push each head to its volume limits, the Wally Ultra would be the champ. In every regard, with the Bergies at least, the Walter Woods is my strong favorite. I have not used the WWU with the Accugroove cabs recently, though I do recall that when I powered my Whappo, Jr. with both the WWU and the iAMP 800, I had a slight preference for the iAMP.

Shortly after this test, I was also able to run all of these heads through some Accugroove cabs. To my surprise, the results were notably different from my tests with the Bergantino's. Here is what I heard:

The iAMP 800 with the Tri 210L had very thick, full tone, and gobs of low end (the most of the group). However, as I have found in the past, I found that the iAMP with Accugroove cabs leaves me wanted a bit more high end (which is easy enough to add). Since the wife and kids were out of the house, I did get to crank the volume up quite a bit, and the iAMP pushes the Tri 210L (set to 4 ohm) quite well, again with lots of low end, even right up to "full volume" - or as close to it as I dared to go. I am not a slapper, but I do hit the strings pretty hard (fingerstyle). When I would hit them quite hard, the iAMP gave a nice snappy, quick articulate hit, and after a bit more experimentation, I decided that the iAMP would be the clear choice if I were a slapper. Nice, fast transients that don't get harsh at all.

With the Thunderfunk, you get a lot more high end (the most of the group), but the lows were not as full or as loud as with the other amps (particularly the EA). Again, if you want more low end, EQ is there for you, and the Thunderfunk has plenty of tone shaping options. Overall loudness seemed to be on par with the EA, but the difference in thick low end was even more apparent at volume. Still, the Thunderfunk drove the Tri 210L quite well, and as I am sure many of you know, Accugroove cabs have tons of low end and fat, full tone, so the net effect is pretty well balanced.

The Walter Woods sounded fantastic, as expected. It was also the loudest of the group. The low end was very close to as full as with the EA, though perhaps not as tight - though this was not as noticeable as with some other cabs I have tried. In general, everything sounded great with the WWU. The high end was not as pronounced as with the Thunderfunk, but it wasn't far behind, had that air of refinement that Walter's amps always give. The mids were beautiful, and in general I was quite reminded of the sound of the WWU through the Bergies. When I cranked up the volume, the Walter Woods was again the loudest, but still did not have the amount of low end that the iAMP put out.

The Walkabout was the real surprise of the group and my overall favorite with the Tri 210L. This blew my mind! I had not expected it to be in the top three, and here it ends up at the top of the heap! The tone was closest to the Walter Woods, but with more of a midrange presence, and somewhat warmer. Lows were the best that I have heard out of the Walkabout. Very full, very musical, and without any of the "mushiness" that I have heard with other cabs. The Tri 210L deserves a lot of the credit, here, but regardless, it was a very good pairing. And get this, the volume seemed to be at least as loud as the Thunderfunk and iAMP 800! Something about the Tri 210L seemed to let the Walkbout really sing at volume, and at the point where I have heard it sound like it is breaking up with other cabs, I could crank it up even more and still get great tone and good dynamics. Highs were very good, too. I just couldn't believe how nice this sounded.

Any of these heads would be very good with Accugroove cabs - which again says a lot for Mark's cabs!

Well, I hope this helps, Tom.

Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Mini Cab Combo Shootout

Okay, I am obsessed with bass gear. That's no surprise. I have come to grips with this affliction, and now I am always trying to find ways to satisfy my extreme curiosity in what I hope is a somewhat beneficial manner. Therefore, after participating in several threads recently regarding different combinations of smaller cabs, I bring to you, Tom Bowlus' Mini Cab Combo Shootout!

Here are the competitors:



For those of you who don't know these cabs by sight, from left to right, they are:

Bergantino EX112/HT112
Two EA Wizzy's
Epifani T-112/T-110UL
EA CXL-112/CXL-210 (I know it's not quite mini, but I threw it in anyways - plus, I don't have two CXL-112s)
EA VL-110/VL-208

Yes, it's an "EA-heavy" group, but that's the kind of guy I am! I chose these particular combination of cabs based in part upon recent threads, based in part upon common configurations among other TBers and the observed synergy between particular cabs, and based in part upon my own personal preferences. I will point out that I have some other single "mini" cabs that are very worthy (Hevos Midget, EA VL-108, ACME Low B-2), but I wanted to keep this comparision to just combinations of mini (or almost mini, in the case of the CXL's) cabs.

I should, of course, say that these are all excellent cabs in their own right (if I didn't feel this way, I wouldn't bother keeping them all around!), and personal preferences will vary greatly among different players. My observations are my own, and your opinions will certainly vary from mine. For testing, I used both my rack rig (Eden Navigator, QSC PLX 3002) and my iAMP 800. Except for use of the "Deep" switch on my iAMP 800, all EQ settings were set flat. I tried the Navigator with Enhance off or set at 12 o'clock, and ultimately left it off for testing). I would have also used my Walter Woods, but Todd VanSelus is playing with it right now. The overall sound was somewhat different, as you would expect, but the relative results were the same with either the rack rig or the iAMP. While I have used most of these cabs with URB to good effect in the past, I didn't feel like breaking out the doghouse for this one. Most of my testing was done with my favorite axe - 1991 Gibson Thunderbird IV - but 5-string response was briefly tested with my modified DeArmond Pilot 5 Deluxe (the short answer here is that all combos will reproduce the low B to an extent that is consistent with my overall impressions listed below).

In my original post on TalkBass.com, I presented my "findings" in random order, without indicating up front which combo is which. But as this blog is an effort to somewhat condense my comments, etc., I will indicate up front which is which.

Epifani T-112/T-110UL: This combo had the deepest response overall, with a hint of mid scoop, but you probably wouldn't notice it if it wasn't being compared to other, midrange friendly smaller cabs. I'd call it "polite" in the mids, more than "mid-shy." Definitely the biggest low end, though, and very nice high end. Somewhat of an "old school vibe", but not so much as Combo C. Really likes being driven hard. With the "Deep" switch on the iAMP 800 engaged, though, it became too low end heavy.

EA CxL-112/CxL-210: This was both the tightest sounding and the thinest sounding of the group. Clarity was razor sharp. With the "Deep" switch engaged on the iAMP 800, though, these two cabs really come to life and handle the extra lows without any problems. Set flat, though, it was by far the smallest sounding combo of the group. With the "Deep" switch engaged, and with the volume cranked, though, it became a monstrously full and loud rig. Ultimately, a very flexible combo, but needs EQing.

Bergantino EX112/HT112: This combo hit the "old school vibe" right off the bat. The lows weren't earth shaking, but output was respectable for the size of the cab ("Deep" worked to provide excellent fundamental support at lower volumes, but I wasn't comfortable using it with higher volumes). Articulation throughout the midrange was punchy, if not ultimately as clear as some of the others. Low mids up through middle mids are its strength. Also a little bit polite in the upper mids, but not so much as Combo A. Very punchy overall, especially in the heart of the midrange. Slightly "roundish" sound, overall.

EA Wizzy's: At similar volume settings, this was the loudest combo of the group. Articulation was very good from top to bottom. Overall clarity was a shade behind Combos B and E, but in the same ballpark. Low end was surprisingly strong, and just barely behind Combo A. With "Deep" engaged, it became huge, but still manageable, and could be used even at higher volumes. Also very punchy, but more of a high-mid punch, when compared to Combo C. A very balanced combo, but with an extra layer of upper midrange presence, and a hint of warmth.

EA VL-110/VL-208: This combo had it all - strong lows, balanced mids, smooth sweet highs, and ability to be driven very hard without breaking up. You could probably dial in the sound of almost any of the other combos with these two cabs. The "Deep" switch was pretty much unnecessary, but if used, it worked much like with Combo C, and again, I wouldn't use it if pushing the volume really loud. The only complaint of this combo compared to the others might be that since it seems to hit on all cylinders across the board, it doesn't have as much "personality" as the others.